Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	friedrich
Date/Time:	Sun, July 9, 2000 at 11:57 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	Agreed
Message:
I agree with you, too. Reverse hijacking is like taking off the land of the red-indians. They were there before, but not strong enough to keep it and somebody with guns and money took it away. The internet community is like the red-indians and again hardly any judge is around to protect them. In the opposite! It is like repeating history. Does the U.S. based "world police" not stand for justice in their own country - as soon as financial interests are involved again? Regards, Friedrich

Message Thread:

• Current TLD Dispute procedure must be sorted out first — duffyking, July 8 @ 9:28 PM (6/18)
• Agreed — friedrich, July 9 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)
• Again, Thanks — duffyking, July 9 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
• To protect your domain name — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 10:46 AM (2/7)
• Bad Idea — layman, July 9 @ 12:40 AM (2/5)
• Who is afraid of .reg? — friedrich, July 9 @ 2:20 PM (1/3)
• As I said — layman, July 9 @ 5:30 PM (2/2)
• dot REG is a certificate of authentication — Garry Anderson, July 10 @ 9:47 AM (0/0)
• Thanks for your (wrong) advices. — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)
• You misunderstand - like most TM companies — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)
• Thanks but this won't work internationally — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)
• I agree BUT — Merlin, July 9 @ 6:49 AM (1/1)
• If rules were laid down first this would work — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:54 AM (0/0)
• A GOOD PROPOSAL — Sotiris, July 9 @ 5:42 AM (1/1)
• ICANN set the rules so they should be involved — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:40 AM (0/0)
• Hear, hear! — Venster, July 8 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)
• Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)
• AGREED! — AboutMoney, July 8 @ 9:37 PM (1/1)
• Thanks — duffyking, July 8 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy