Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Guide International |
Date/Time: |
Wed, November 1, 2000 at 7:41 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Support for .event |
Message: |
|
As an end user of this type of proposed TLD, I am a great supporter
of .event, and the whole idea of subdomians. In business on the internet the main
problem is how reach the right customer and how to get them to your site. Till now
this has been a shot in the dark effort at best and a financial disaster at worst.
Now ICANN has a way and means to organize the internet, allow search engines a way
to find the right sites for the user, and expand the internet all at the same time.
Business needs to get on the internet, but how to do it in a way that you can drive
more customers into your business? With this TLD I can get the name I want, one that
describes my business, but ICANN get a TLD that can covers a wide range of sites.
TLDs also need to be restricted. I’m so tired of looking for a company, product,
or information only to do a search and then click on a site only to find it is a
porno site. I don’t want that happening to my hard earned customers. After reading
Internet Events International’s proposal I think they are the right people with the
right idea. I think most of the businesses out there are looking for this type of
leadership and direction. These are people we can do business with. I think business
are looking for organization of the internet, better ways to search the internet
to get customers to our sites, the use of multi-language protocol, and leadership
both from ICANN and the Registry Operator. I think Internet Events International’s
proposal to use of multi-language protocol, a restricted TLD, and by bringing domains
together categorically through the use of a sub-domain system is way to do this.
It is my hope that ICANN will very seriously consider grating their proposal.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .event Application by Internet Events International, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:25 PM (20/31)
- Support for .event. jlasko, November 5 @ 9:36 AM (0/0)
- Support for .event; User friendly way to navigate the Internet JL Enterprises, November 4 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)
- Support for .event Mr.Looney, November 4 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- Businesses NEED .Event kandl, November 4 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
- .EVENT Technomancer, November 2 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
- Support for .event Guide International, November 1 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)
- Most versatile TLD proposed FAguirre, October 30 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- support for .event asthoreth, October 30 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
- NZ Supports Event tania torea, October 29 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
- UNANIMOUS SUPPORT FOR .EVENT People For Domain Ethics, October 29 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- supportfor.event. groove69, October 29 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
- support for .event marcus, October 27 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)
- support of .event Petunia, October 27 @ 3:10 AM (0/0)
- AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS .event! Jordan, October 27 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
- Makes sense shondratasha, October 26 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)
- .event app peniel, October 25 @ 11:29 PM (2/2)
- Excellent idea for ordering web chaos-restricted TLD's! mohr4me, October 25 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
- Support for .event ElectricSmash, October 23 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)
- Should be denied jandl, October 14 @ 8:00 PM (3/8)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy