Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	aaaswt
Date/Time:	Mon, November 13, 2000 at 1:13 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	.SHOP WAS  (i)"CANNED"
Message:
It seems to me that the Name-Space, Commercial-Connect, and Eastern applications were pretty much non-reviewed, or perhaps just "scanned" by ICANN and it's consultants.  It appears  the respective reports do not offer concrete fact as justification for taking these applicants out of the race.  Maybe if Affilias had applied for .shop, ICANN would have taken the public opinion regarding that particular TLD more seriously.

Message Thread:

• Give the people what they want ! — pedro, November 13 @ 4:53 AM (3/13)
• Not Political Enough — DaveBusiness, November 13 @ 2:20 PM (0/0)
• And what about .shop? — fabrcop, November 13 @ 11:24 AM (2/10)
• My Response - ICANN Kindly Take Note — Eliahu, November 13 @ 5:53 PM (2/8)
• What to do with Afilias — jeffrey, November 13 @ 9:16 PM (1/2)
• repercussions of not awarding Afilias a TLD? — sunshine, November 14 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)
• Egg-on-face factor — jeffrey, November 14 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
• I disagree — sunshine, November 13 @ 6:06 PM (1/4)
• I Am In Favor Of Afilias Doing Well;  Only Not As A Monopoly — Eliahu, November 13 @ 6:29 PM (1/3)
• and... — sunshine, November 13 @ 6:52 PM (1/2)
• Let Us Analyze The Pie For A Minute — Eliahu, November 13 @ 7:18 PM (1/1)
• and one more thing... — sunshine, November 13 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)
• .SHOP WAS  (i)"CANNED" — aaaswt, November 13 @ 1:13 PM (0/0)
• Agree ! — kend, November 13 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy