Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	sunshine
Date/Time:	Tue, November 14, 2000 at 12:06 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95
Score:	5
Subject:	repercussions of not awarding Afilias a TLD?
Message:
>>>What would the repercussions of not giving Afilias any TLD be?  After such a glowing initial review, a very bad lawsuit to be sure (perhaps filed by Ken Stubbs!-oh what irony).<<< There shouldn't be any repercussions (except ICANN admitting a poor report). All they'd have to show is conflict of interest and the fact that the Afilias consortium holds 98% of the current registry (wouldn't foster competition to be awarded any TLD). Due to these two factors (one alone is sufficient), Aflias should be disqualified. --M Lynn

Message Thread:

• Give the people what they want ! — pedro, November 13 @ 4:53 AM (3/13)
• Not Political Enough — DaveBusiness, November 13 @ 2:20 PM (0/0)
• And what about .shop? — fabrcop, November 13 @ 11:24 AM (2/10)
• My Response - ICANN Kindly Take Note — Eliahu, November 13 @ 5:53 PM (2/8)
• What to do with Afilias — jeffrey, November 13 @ 9:16 PM (1/2)
• repercussions of not awarding Afilias a TLD? — sunshine, November 14 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)
• Egg-on-face factor — jeffrey, November 14 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
• I disagree — sunshine, November 13 @ 6:06 PM (1/4)
• I Am In Favor Of Afilias Doing Well;  Only Not As A Monopoly — Eliahu, November 13 @ 6:29 PM (1/3)
• and... — sunshine, November 13 @ 6:52 PM (1/2)
• Let Us Analyze The Pie For A Minute — Eliahu, November 13 @ 7:18 PM (1/1)
• and one more thing... — sunshine, November 13 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)
• .SHOP WAS  (i)"CANNED" — aaaswt, November 13 @ 1:13 PM (0/0)
• Agree ! — kend, November 13 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy