RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not the first time we disagree but I strongly disagree.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> 
> On 14 Apr 2010, at 18:22, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > "Recommendation 2 of the GNSO new gTLD recommendations 
> (restriction of confusingly similar new gTLDs) was not 
> intended to prevent an applicant from applying for multiple 
> IDN versions of the same gTLD, whether that gTLD is an 
> existing gTLD or a new gTLD."  I strongly believe that that 
> is an accurate statement regardless of how one defines 
> confusingly similar.
> 
> 
> I do not believe it is an accurate statement.
> 
> It is a topic that was not discussed in sufficient depth, if 
> at all, and it is impossible to make any claims about the GNSO intent.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>