<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- From: "Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:51:17 -0400
I agree.
Claudio
________________________________
From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga
Cavalli
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Claudio Di Gangi; Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
I think that Cuck´s proposal sunds more clear.
what do others think?
Olga
2009/4/23 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Do we really mean 'participation' or should we be talking about membership
eligibility? For example:
1. Develop guidlines, rules or principles for constituency membership in
stakeholder groups, and
2. Develop guidelines, rules or principles for membership in constituencies.
I am not sure it is our task to recommenda how constituencies should
participate in SGs or for that matter how individuals or organizations should
participate in constituencies, but I believe the Board definitely want
reasonably open membership for SGs and constituencies.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:03 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask
1
Dear Team,
After re-reading the thread, I believe I better understand the text.
Perhaps the following small tweak makes the language more clear:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
constituencies across stakeholder groups." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for members
in a constituency. "
Claudio
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:07 AM
To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask
1
Neutral is fine. I thought 'new' was being added when maybe the red
meant deleted. My mistake.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:02 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista';
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
Victoria I understood your edits were to remove the "new" and
just make the statements neutral as to either new or existing constituencies?
Chuck do you mean to more specific? Rather than neutral maybe it should just
read as follows:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in
a new or existing constituency for each stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
new or existing members in a constituency. "
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-22-09 9:52 AM
To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency
operations relates to both existing and new constituencies. So to the extent
that the new wording eliminates existing constituencies, I don't think it
works. But maybe I am misunderstanding something. I strongly believe that we
seriously need to discuss this in our meeting and that that will be much more
effective.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes, Chuck;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1
I think Victoria's point is quite valid and therefore
support the language with her edit.
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx;
OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1
As to the language issue, I do think we should discuss
on our call the carve out issue first -ie are there any aspects of the BGC's
report and recommendations on constituency structure: inclusiveness,
effectiveness and efficiency (see pages 39-46) that anyone considers are not in
our remit? If so why?
I am happy with the changes below -with the deletion of
the words NEW in each case -as our recommendations will apply to existing
constituencies just as to new ones.
I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the
existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as
suggested by Victoria. Here is the suggested text:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. "
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its
attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work
Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1
Sorry all. I am just catching up. I, too, am fine
with 1 and 2 below.
Julie, thank you for the well articulated outline of
the various suggestions.
Krista Papac
Sales Executive
Iron Mountain Digital
5530 Bandini Blvd
Bell, CA 90201 US
Home Office: +001.714.846.8780
Mobile: +001.646.379.4689
Fax: +001.323.443.3573
krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>
Tour Iron Mountain
<http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp>
© 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Iron Mountain and the design of the mountain are registered trademarks of Iron
Mountain Incorporated.
Iron Mountain Privacy Policy:
http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp Iron Mountain, 745 Atlantic
Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111 www.ironmountain.com <http://www.ironmountain.com/>
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1
I am fine with the latest suggested wording for 1 and 2
below.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
Dear Work Team Members,
We have had a very helpful discussion on the
email list that has produced several recommendations to amend the language in
Task 1, Subtask 1, of our work plan. Here are the recommendations:
1. S.S. recommends changing:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new constituency for each stakeholder group." to:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."
2. Victoria noted that the language she
suggested and that we all agreed to was:
"Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation..." to replace "template for admission decision procedures..."
3. Olga and Michael suggested that there could
be two items -- a revised item 1 and a new item 2 as follows:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new constituency to a stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."
I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the
existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as
suggested by Victoria. Here is the suggested text:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. "
I welcome your comments and suggestions. Thank
you.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund
Policy Consultant
________________________________
The information contained in this email message and its
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications medium.
If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as
defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to
email you must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that
supports your obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in
error, you must take no action based on the information in this email and you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
original message.
![JPEG image](jpgvTV9F25SLx.jpg)
- References:
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|