RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

["Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>]

I agree.

 

Claudio

 

________________________________

From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga 
Cavalli
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Claudio Di Gangi; Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

I think that Cuck´s proposal sunds more clear.
what do others think?
Olga

2009/4/23 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Do we really mean 'participation' or should we be talking about membership 
eligibility?  For example:

 

1. Develop guidlines, rules or principles for constituency membership in 
stakeholder groups, and

2. Develop guidelines, rules or principles for membership in constituencies.

 

I am not sure it is our task to recommenda how constituencies should 
participate in SGs or for that matter how individuals or organizations should 
participate in constituencies, but I believe the Board definitely want 
reasonably open membership for SGs and constituencies.

 

Chuck

         

        
________________________________


        From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:03 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team

        
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 
1

         

        Dear Team,

         

        After re-reading the thread, I believe I better understand the text. 
Perhaps the following small tweak makes the language more clear:

         

        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for 
constituencies across stakeholder groups." and 

        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for members 
in a constituency. " 

         

        Claudio

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:07 AM
        To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 
1

         

        Neutral is fine.  I thought 'new' was being added when maybe the red 
meant deleted.  My mistake.

         

        Chuck

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:02 AM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, 
Subtask 1

                Victoria I understood your edits were to remove the "new" and 
just make the statements neutral as to either new or existing constituencies?  
Chuck do you mean to more specific? Rather than neutral maybe it should just 
read as follows:

                 

                "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in 
a new or existing constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for 
new or existing members in a constituency. " 

                 

                 

                 

                Best Regards,

                 

                Michael Young

                 

                Vice-President,

                Product Development

                Afilias

                O: +14166734109

                C: +16472891220

                 

                From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: April-22-09 9:52 AM
                To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, 
Subtask 1

                 

                Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency 
operations relates to both existing and new constituencies.  So to the extent 
that the new wording eliminates existing constituencies, I don't think it 
works.  But maybe I am misunderstanding something.  I strongly believe that we 
seriously need to discuss this in our meeting and that that will be much more 
effective.

                 

                Chuck

                         

                        
________________________________


                        From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
                        To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes, Chuck; 
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan 
Task 1, Subtask 1

                        I think Victoria's point is quite valid and therefore 
support the language with her edit.

                         

                        Best Regards,

                         

                        Michael Young

                         

                        Vice-President,

                        Product Development

                        Afilias

                        O: +14166734109

                        C: +16472891220

                         

                        From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
                        To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
OSC-CSG Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan 
Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        As to the language issue, I do think we should discuss 
on our call the carve out issue first -ie are there any aspects of the BGC's 
report and recommendations on constituency structure: inclusiveness, 
effectiveness and efficiency (see pages 39-46) that anyone considers are not in 
our remit? If so why? 

                         

                        I am happy with the changes below -with the deletion of 
the words NEW in each case -as our recommendations will apply to existing 
constituencies just as to new ones. 

                         

                        I would like to suggest a way to combine these 
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the 
existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as 
suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                         

                        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for 
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for 
participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                         

                         

                         

                         

                        Victoria McEvedy

                        Principal 

                        McEvedys

                        Solicitors and Attorneys 

                         

                         

                        96 Westbourne Park Road 

                        London 

                        W2 5PL

                         

                        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

                        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

                        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

                         

                        www.mcevedy.eu  

                        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

                        This email and its attachments are confidential and 
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its 
attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, 
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its 
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

                        This email does not create a solicitor-client 
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication. 

                         

                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
                        Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
                        To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work 
Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan 
Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        Sorry all.  I am just catching up.  I, too, am fine 
with 1 and 2 below.

                         

                        Julie, thank you for the well articulated outline of 
the various suggestions.

                         

                        Krista Papac 
                        Sales Executive 
                        Iron Mountain Digital 
                        5530 Bandini Blvd 
                        Bell, CA  90201  US 
                        Home Office: +001.714.846.8780 
                        Mobile: +001.646.379.4689 
                        Fax: +001.323.443.3573 
                        krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

                        Visit the new www.ironmountain.com 
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>  
                        Tour Iron Mountain 
<http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp>  

                        © 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights reserved. 
Iron Mountain and the design of the mountain are registered trademarks of Iron 
Mountain Incorporated. 

                        Iron Mountain Privacy Policy: 
http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp  Iron Mountain, 745 Atlantic 
Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111 www.ironmountain.com <http://www.ironmountain.com/> 

                        
________________________________


                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
                        Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
                        To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan 
Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        I am fine with the latest suggested wording for 1 and 2 
below.

                         

                        Chuck

                                 

                                
________________________________


                                From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
                                Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
                                To: OSC-CSG Work Team
                                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team 
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                                Dear Work Team Members,

                                 

                                We have had a very helpful discussion on the 
email list that has produced several recommendations to amend the language in 
Task 1, Subtask 1, of our work plan.  Here are the recommendations:

                                 

                                1.  S.S. recommends changing: 

                                 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission 
decision procedures for a new constituency for each stakeholder group."  to: 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission 
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."

                                 

                                2.  Victoria noted that the language she 
suggested and that we all agreed  to was: 

                                 

                                "Develop guidance, rules or principles for 
participation..." to replace "template for admission decision procedures..." 

                                 

                                3.  Olga and Michael suggested that there could 
be two items -- a revised item 1 and a new item 2 as follows: 

                                 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission 
decision procedures for a new constituency to a stakeholder group." and 

                                "2. Develop guidelines for defining admission 
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."  

                                 

                                I would like to suggest a way to combine these 
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the 
existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as 
suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                                 

                                "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for 
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                                "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for 
participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                                 

                                I welcome your comments and suggestions.  Thank 
you.  

                                 

                                Best regards, 

                                 

                                Julie

                                Julie Hedlund

                                Policy Consultant

                                 

                        
________________________________


                        The information contained in this email message and its 
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the 
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. 
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. 
If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as 
defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to 
email you must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that 
supports your obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in 
error, you must take no action based on the information in this email and you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of 
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the 
original message.