RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] CIG and Individuals

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,

I was not advocating for top-down rules from unaffected third parties
but simply responding to the reference to such rules, not fully
understanding what that reference targeted.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:59 AM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] CIG and Individuals
> 
> 
> Chuck, I assume your comment was with respect to whether 
> there should be something in the rules to cover appeals of 
> constituency decisions. 
> I could certainly live with a general rule such as that but I 
> am not convinced that the GNSO has the mandate to make such a 
> rule, or enforce it. I would think that this would be a 
> Board-level decision (or a group that it explicitly 
> identifies to take on that  role).
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 12/05/2009 09:37 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> >Unless of course we consider the Board's GNSO Improvements 
> >Recommendations as top down rules.  Personally, I see them as 
> >guidelines for which we need to develop implementation 
> plans, but they 
> >are guidelines I don't think we can ignore.
> >
> >Chuck
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip 
> > > Sheppard
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 3:16 AM
> > > To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] CIG and Individuals
> > >
> > >
> > > Alain, your concern is null and void.
> > > you just said you wanted a home for "a new class of entrepreneurs 
> > > that the web economy has created".
> > > By that you mean entrepreneurs who have "demonstrated commercial 
> > > intent".
> > > I believe I explained the BC test as being "a demonstration of 
> > > commercial intent".
> > > Our philosophy is one of inclusion.
> > >
> > > And I do agree with you, we do not need top-down rules from 
> > > unaffected third parties telling others how to run a constituency.
> > > There are more pressing matters for the OSC.
> > >
> > > Philip
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
>