Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

The MAPO group, like the STI, broke the issue down into a lot of very 
specific points, and then tried to get consensus on them one by one. 
That is FAR easier than attacking the issue as a whole. But early on, 
many of the participants in this group decided that the various 
component parts were too inter-related to consider one by one.
And I note that one of the substantial points addressed by the STI 
group, and wrestled to the ground by serious horse-trading to the 
relative satisfaction of all - the 20 day reply period for a URS - 
was overturned by the Board during its retreat.
Alan

At 27/09/2010 09:25 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> hi all,
>
> i'm really curious how the MaPO group got that matrix of theirs 
> pulled together.  i know there's a lot of overlap between our two 
> groups.  can somebody who was in that group chime in with a quick 
> summary of what the sequence of events was?  i'm hoping that might 
> show us a way forward.
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)