ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:21:17 -0400

The MAPO group, like the STI, broke the issue down into a lot of very specific points, and then tried to get consensus on them one by one. That is FAR easier than attacking the issue as a whole. But early on, many of the participants in this group decided that the various component parts were too inter-related to consider one by one.

And I note that one of the substantial points addressed by the STI group, and wrestled to the ground by serious horse-trading to the relative satisfaction of all - the 20 day reply period for a URS - was overturned by the Board during its retreat.


At 27/09/2010 09:25 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

hi all,

i'm really curious how the MaPO group got that matrix of theirs pulled together. i know there's a lot of overlap between our two groups. can somebody who was in that group chime in with a quick summary of what the sequence of events was? i'm hoping that might show us a way forward.



- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy