Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
The MAPO group, like the STI, broke the issue down into a lot of very specific points, and then tried to get consensus on them one by one. That is FAR easier than attacking the issue as a whole. But early on, many of the participants in this group decided that the various component parts were too inter-related to consider one by one.
And I note that one of the substantial points addressed by the STI group, and wrestled to the ground by serious horse-trading to the relative satisfaction of all - the 20 day reply period for a URS - was overturned by the Board during its retreat.
Alan At 27/09/2010 09:25 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
hi all,i'm really curious how the MaPO group got that matrix of theirs pulled together. i know there's a lot of overlap between our two groups. can somebody who was in that group chime in with a quick summary of what the sequence of events was? i'm hoping that might show us a way forward.thanks, mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)