<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- To: vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:50:44 -0500
just checking...
here's a starter-kit of bullet points that we might be able to put into a
consensus statement;
-- Certain new gTLDs likely to be applied for in the first round may be
unnecessarily impacted by restrictions on cross-ownership or control between
registrar and registry.
-- There is need for a process that would allow applicants to request
exceptions and have them considered on a case-by-case basis.
-- The concept of Single Registrant, Single User TLDs should be explored
further.
-- There will exist need for enhanced compliance efforts and the need for a
detailed compliance plan in relation to the new gTLD program in general.
that's an ever-so-slightly edited version of the principles list...
i think there are two areas of consensus -- 1) the need for exceptions and 2)
the importance of capable compliance.
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|