ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The GAC weighs in on MR2

  • To: "'Evan Leibovitch'" <evan@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Rafik Dammak'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The GAC weighs in on MR2
  • From: <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:24:50 +0100

Also, it would be great if they can give us the yearly continuity operation 
cost that they will consider in their application evaluation. 

 

De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Evan Leibovitch
Envoyé : dimanche 29 mai 2011 20:11
À : Rafik Dammak
Cc : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The GAC weighs in on MR2

 

Hi Rafik,

 

I agree that we should give Karla a more detailed request. Obviously generic 
questions will be met with generic responses.

 

I would like to start a brief discussion on what we will need from ICANN staff 
in order to move ahead. Personally, I think that amongst the specific details 
that we need is a detailed breakdown of the $185K. Such a detail breakdown must 
indicate how much of the $185K is allocated to:

 

- cover the actual (ie, real time) cost to process the application

- apply various tests and controls (ie contention) that may not be appropriate 
to JAS-qualified applications

- repay costs of historic policy work

- replenish the reserve fund for costs incurred by previous applications (ie, 
.XXX)

- mitigate risk of lawsuits

- fund any other relevant cost category (i'm quite sure I don't have them all 
here)

 

I would also like to obtain a fairly comprehensive set of the assumptions and 
formulas that have been made in order to deduce the current scheme.

 

I'm sure (and I hope) that others can contribute to build a specific request, 
one that (if answered truthfully and completely) will result in information 
that can better guide our ability to derive a suitable and  justifiable amount 
for a reduced price.

 

- Evan

 

 

On 29 May 2011 13:19, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

 

*       We now have further justification for the additional resources 
requested in the last JAS phone call

 

regarding the additional resources requested, it will be helpful to draft the 
questions that JAS WG is asking and the exact nature/expertise that we are 
looking for, especially about the legal knowledge, few questions and requests 
which Karla can pass to legal staff and letting them ready in prior to confcall.

 

Regards

 

Rafik 




-- 

Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56

 

  _____  

Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message.
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 10.0.1375 / Base de données virale: 1509/3668 - Date: 29/05/2011



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy