<<< Think about the dramatic impact on all our problems of an inability to transfer
domain names. You should cancel them first, unless the new owner is an affiliate
of the former owner. Like some countries do. End of cybersquatting. >>>Would you
prohibit a company from selling the business that it has set up on a website--much
the way businesses are sold in the brick and mortar world?
If I owned Perfume.com
and sold perfume on that site as a subdivision of a larger company. . . would your
vision of domain transfer policy enable me to sell my site business to an interested
party, so he could pick up the profits, and even reorganize the commercial structure
of the site? Or do I just have to close my Internet doors and not benefit the way
offline businesses do when there is an interested buyer?
If you would allow me
to retain the rights of a business transfer, then inherent in that transfer would
be the domain name.
Same thing, different route.
Enough with hating people who
make money from selling domains.
I have NEVER made a penny on a sale, but have
had parties approach me with offers on 1 or 2 of my generics. We could not come to
an agreement, because I deemed the domain to be worth more, based upon the kind of
money I could make from the developed site.
But what if the other party deemed
my asking price to be a worthwhile investment? Do you feel it necessary to stick
your nose in there, and say, "no can do!!"
lol. . . That's pretentious. And it
is not the way the world in offline business works.