>Think about the dramatic impact on all our problems of an inability to transfer
domain names. You should cancel them first, unless the new owner is an affiliate
of the former owner. Like some countries do.The only reason you wish to stop transfer
of domains, is to stop individual people investing and making money out of it.
What
about the Bank of America - should they give LOAN.COM up then?
What about all other
trading?
What about investing in limited editions of anything?
What about stocks
and shares - should you give up those, even at original value?
>End of cybersquatting.
So
you include people who includes anyone with GENERIC names?
Like Procter & Gamble
Co., the largest U.S. maker of household products, has bought thousands of domains.
They have been sitting on many for five years. Media has not bad mouthed them in
all this time. It is now to sell 100, including beautiful.com. Double standards.
>I
would be creating a working group to dig into this and to formaly propose to set
it up.
You have not got a clue - stick to something you know about.