Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
rhyne |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 18, 2000 at 11:14 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Navigator V4.7 Custom using XWindows/IRIX64 6.5 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
.geo Application by SRI International |
Message: |
|
This note is in support of
SRI International's ICANN application to create a new top-level domain for the
discovery of geospatial information entitled ".geo". On July 26th, 2000, at
the Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Graphics (ACM-SIGGRAPH)'s
annual conference (SIGGRAPH 2000), SRI International presented their intent to
submit an ICANN proposal for ".geo" at the ACM SIGGRAPH Carto Birds of a Feather
Session. The ACM SIGGRAPH Carto Project is an effort, begun in 1996, to
explore how viewpoints and techniques from the computer graphics community can
be effectively applied to cartographic and spatial data sets. The GeoVRML working
group of the Web3D Consortium is an outgrowth of the ACM SIGGRAPH Carto Project's
effort and the Carto Project also has an ongoing collaboration with the International
Cartographic Association's Commission on Visualization and Virtual Reality.SRI
International's ".geo" proposal was enthusiastically embraced at the ACM SIGGRAPH
Carto BOF and we are thrilled to see that their proposal has been put forward
to ICANN. For a summary of the ACM SIGGRAPH Carto BOF meeting at SIGGRAPH 2000,
please see: http://www.siggraph.org/~rhyne/carto/carto2ksum.html We are hopeful
that SRI International's ".geo" proposal will receive a positive review by ICANN.
Theresa-Marie
Rhyne Director - ACM SIGGRAPH Carto Project
(rhyne@siggraph.org)
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .geo Application by SRI International Moderator, October 7 @ 10:22 PM (23/28)
- Letter of Support cgshepard, November 6 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)
- SRI Comments regarding dot-geo dot-geo, November 6 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
- Is this TLD really needed? sking, November 5 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
- the dot-geo and its potential positive effects Spaceman, November 5 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)
- Technical and Institutional Reservations concerning .geo kottman, November 4 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Support for .Geo Proposal LStephens, November 4 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
- Policy Questions About dot.geo jmoeller, November 3 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
- Towards Transparency: Figuring Out the Corporate Parentage & Value Proposition of Dot.Geo Bruce Cahan, November 3 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
- A GIS ezine looks at .geo Adena, November 2 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)
- .geo plus .i = ? adoyle, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
- Doubts about .geo TLD ddnebert, October 30 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)
- Web3D Consortium supports .geo neiltrevett, October 29 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)
- .geo and education BlackLineFish, October 26 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
- Letter of support dimo, October 26 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
- Sri's .geo app peniel, October 25 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
- Letter of Support WSchwaderer, October 25 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)
- Criticism of the SRI .geo proposal steve_l, October 24 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- Support for .geo by X3D & NPS brutzman, October 19 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- Digital Earth comment on .geo Percivall, October 19 @ 2:30 PM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- .geo Application by SRI International rhyne, October 18 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)
- .geo & e-tourism jachia, October 17 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)
- .geo application web site at www.dotgeo.org Martin, October 14 @ 12:24 AM (1/4)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy