Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
fabrcop |
Date/Time: |
Wed, November 15, 2000 at 2:15 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Actually DNSO is considered so important in ICANN... |
Message: |
|
... so I really see a conflict
of interest.There are three possible solutions. ICANN, please choose one of
the following: 1) DNSO must not be considered important at all by ICANN; 2)
Mr. Stubbs must dismissed from DNSO and from anything else connected with
ICANN; 3) Afilias' application for new TLDs must be refused (and the same
for other applications where Mr. Stubbs is involved in) Regards Fabrizio Coppola Italy
|
| |
Message Thread:
- Vote 'No Confidence' in Ken Stubbs - please post a reply if you agree. JaseK, November 15 @ 11:53 AM (11/13)
- Absolutely correct blefarge, November 16 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)
- I second this LauraDVM, November 16 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)
- I vote NO to Afilias and Ken Stubbs! First1, November 16 @ 1:48 AM (0/0)
- No to conflicts of interest huguesdb, November 16 @ 12:47 AM (0/0)
- Possibly Ken Stubbs doesn't realize himself that there may well be a "hidden" influence existing friedrich, November 15 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- NO to Ken Stubbs / conflict of interest bartender, November 15 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
- No to either applicants or ICANN members with conflicts jeffrey, November 15 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- Actually DNSO is considered so important in ICANN... fabrcop, November 15 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)
- No Confidence in Ken Stubbs Reynaiel, November 15 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
- Vote NO to Conflict of Interest cello, November 15 @ 1:13 PM (0/0)
- Supporting Vote of No Confidence in Ken Stubbs. David Peters, November 15 @ 12:53 AM (2/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy