Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
huguesdb |
| Date/Time: |
Thu, November 16, 2000 at 12:47 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
No to conflicts of interest |
Message: |
|
|
There is a clear need for ICANN and advisory bodies to make public statements on
this issue. Only one member of ICANN recused himself publicly BEFORE the applications
were submitted. I believe several have done so since and from the information on
these forums, several more should do so. This is normal practise. Not doing so
greatly diminishes the credibility of the whole TLD process. It is astounding that
this has not been done. Hugues Du Bois
Switzerland
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- Vote 'No Confidence' in Ken Stubbs - please post a reply if you agree. — JaseK, November 15 @ 11:53 AM (11/13)
- Absolutely correct — blefarge, November 16 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)
- I second this — LauraDVM, November 16 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)
- I vote NO to Afilias and Ken Stubbs! — First1, November 16 @ 1:48 AM (0/0)
- No to conflicts of interest — huguesdb, November 16 @ 12:47 AM (0/0)
- Possibly Ken Stubbs doesn't realize himself that there may well be a "hidden" influence existing — friedrich, November 15 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- NO to Ken Stubbs / conflict of interest — bartender, November 15 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
- No to either applicants or ICANN members with conflicts — jeffrey, November 15 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- Actually DNSO is considered so important in ICANN... — fabrcop, November 15 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)
- No Confidence in Ken Stubbs — Reynaiel, November 15 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
- Vote NO to Conflict of Interest — cello, November 15 @ 1:13 PM (0/0)
- Supporting Vote of No Confidence in Ken Stubbs. — David Peters, November 15 @ 12:53 AM (2/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy