RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

Granted that I was frustrated by having to revisit an old issue but I am
even more frustrated when a discussion of differing points of view are
handled with comments like this. I didn't single you out as one who
contributes to non-progress.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 12:59 PM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> 
> On 18 Apr 2010, at 10:13, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> 
> > I have a recommendation. I recommend that the drafting team 
> > reconstitute, as a smaller group. I recommend that the parties who 
> > have contributed to non-progress not insist upon their continuing 
> > contribution to a second attempt by the reconstituted 
> drafting team to 
> > draft something more substantive than has been achieved to 
> date, for 
> > submission to the Council.
> 
> 
> As this is a drafting team of the council, they can 
> reconstitute it anytime they want with the membership that 
> the council agrees to.  
> 
> as i have been singled out as a person who contributes to 
> non-progress by Chuck and by Eric (not the way i see it, BTW) 
> I should mention that I am willing to be excluded by the 
> council from any Design Team they do not want me on.  I will 
> ask to make sure that the NCSG perspective continues to be 
> properly represented by someone else from the NCSG.  And I 
> will make sure that my views and those of the NCSG are 
> properly represented during any community or Stakeholder 
> group comment period.
> 
> a.
>