ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:14:46 +1000

I must say I am disappointed.

Folks pulling themselves from the list and refusing to participate any further 
in these discussions is disappointing.

It is particularly disappointing due to the fact that those folks are stalwarts 
of our industry adn people I have to come to respect and admire.

We are better than this.

For what it is worth I have found the debate particularly educational. I have 
benefitted greatly from seeing the different points of view. The extra detail 
has not been wasted.

I do not lean one way or the other. I am fearful as I am still not sure that I 
understand all the scenarios.

Please reconsider your actions all.

We can still pull something from this group. Perhaps try to succinctly portray 
the varying opinions on what we thought were "safe" recommendations and 


Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, 19 April 2010 2:59 AM
To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

On 18 Apr 2010, at 10:13, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> I have a recommendation. I recommend that the drafting team
> reconstitute, as a smaller group. I recommend that the parties who
> have contributed to non-progress not insist upon their continuing
> contribution to a second attempt by the reconstituted drafting team to
> draft something more substantive than has been achieved to date, for
> submission to the Council.

As this is a drafting team of the council, they can reconstitute it anytime 
they want with the membership that the council agrees to.  

as i have been singled out as a person who contributes to non-progress by Chuck 
and by Eric (not the way i see it, BTW) I should mention that I am willing to 
be excluded by the council from any Design Team they do not want me on.  I will 
ask to make sure that the NCSG perspective continues to be properly represented 
by someone else from the NCSG.  And I will make sure that my views and those of 
the NCSG are properly represented during any community or Stakeholder group 
comment period.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy