<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:55:59 -0400
Not sure I understand Eric but it's your call.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:39 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
>
> Chuck,
>
> I began advocacy for community applications at the Los
> Angeles meeting, with Werner, as observers. I was, and remain
> appreciative for the opportunities the then Council Chair,
> Avri, provided us to participate.
>
> I wrote that paragraph to point out that the substantive
> issue you and Avri differ on is not the example. If I had
> appreciated, from the perspective of a Council member, which
> is more than observing three times a year and reviewing
> minutes and infrequently the audio, the full import of any
> example, I'd never have offered one.
>
> The difference of opinion you and Avri share has been
> conducted only in a small part within my cognizance. As
> important as it is to each of you, and others, there does not
> appear to be any point to the gnso-idn activity.
>
> There won't be any temporal parity with the ccTLD IDN FT.
>
> There won't be any temporal priority for IDN new gTLDs
> relative to non-IDN new gTLDs.
>
> There simply won't be any gnso-idn anything, just whatever
> eventually happens.
>
> And for those of use with multiple applications, yes, we are
> paying both for all of our average competitors, and if we are
> spending a bean on policy, paying for our competitors who
> don't waste a bean on policy. We can sneak that into the
> Latin+non-Latin application scenario of waste and
> non-cost-recovery, but, speaking for CORE, we never thought
> our cost would be reduced, only that if Staff were aware most
> of our applications were identical, they could put the fee to
> better use than checking, again and again and again, if CORE
> could run a registry.
>
> This is slim pickings for the better part of a year of work.
> I'll ask Glen to remove my address from the mailing list.
>
> Eric
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|