<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now constituency diversity
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now constituency diversity
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:44:42 -0400
That may be okay.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:30 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now
> constituency diversity
>
>
>
> Chuck, I would personally agree to the merit of the
> additional diversity you mention and to its reference in
> stakeholder group or constituency charters but not - for
> reasons - of clarity and practicality - in the by-laws.
>
> It is the business of constituencies to factor in such
> diversity into their positions they advocate on Council.
>
> Philip
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|