RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now constituency diversity

["Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck:

How would you recommend that the RyC amend its Charter to "ensure
constituency [or Constituency or sectoral or interest group] diversity,"
in addition to geographic diversity?  An answer to that question might
help me understand the practical implementation issues related to your
suggestion.

In my mind, Philip's recommendation of referring to Constituencies is no
different than the staff suggestion that we require that every
constituency receive a seat on Council.  I believe that most of us
disagree with that recommendation. 

Thanks.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:21 AM
To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now constituency
diversity


Philip,

Wouldn't you agree that constituency diversity is important whether it
refers to an approved entity or not. For example, financial services
companies are not a defined, Board approved entity (constituency) but
they are an important interest group within the commercial business
community.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:10 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Sectoral diversity now 
> constituency diversity
> 
> 
> 
> Chuck, the point I am making is that we should focus exactly 
> on GNSO constituency diversity (as well s geography).
> They are clear, definable and board approved entities.
> 
> Philip
> 
>