Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Venster
Date/Time:	Sat, July 8, 2000 at 11:26 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	What next: .church ? Who wants this ?
Message:
Why do people want a .union? And who wants it? Is it usefull to create a TLD for a very limited number of second level domains that can easily be found place for in .org? After .union we will have calls for .church, .museum (already mentioned in proposals), .party (in many countries there are more than two), .ath(letics), just to mention a few strictly non-commercial bodies. These should be in .org.
Link:	Superfluous TLDs to satisfy who?

Message Thread:

• ICANN Should Not Accept a .union TLD — Dan Yager, July 8 @ 4:59 PM (2/19)
• Orthogonal gTLDs — jaylev, July 10 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
• .union — fnord, July 8 @ 9:38 PM (1/17)
• What next: .church ? Who wants this ? — Venster, July 8 @ 11:26 PM (1/16)
• need for TLDs — fnord, July 9 @ 12:41 AM (3/15)
• Very true! — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:04 AM (0/0)
• Contradiction — 410, July 9 @ 1:28 AM (1/2)
• miscommunication — fnord, July 9 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)
• Where did we go wrong?  <sob> — 410, July 9 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)
• TLD themes — 410, July 9 @ 1:16 AM (2/10)
• I think Gary wants to solve the trademark problem by introducing new open gtlds ... — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:10 AM (1/4)
• not exactly — fnord, July 9 @ 2:09 PM (2/3)
• Logical answer to all TM problems — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 2:39 PM (1/1)
• fame — fnord, July 9 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
• But ... — friedrich, July 9 @ 2:24 PM (0/0)
• differentiation — fnord, July 9 @ 2:13 AM (1/4)
• I am running out of titles for these posts. . . Heehee — 410, July 9 @ 3:10 AM (1/3)
• ditto :) — fnord, July 9 @ 3:26 AM (1/2)
• So three TLDs walk into a bar. And the bartenders says to the first one. . . — 410, July 9 @ 3:49 AM (1/1)
• ...are you com, net, or org, you look so much alike — fnord, July 9 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy