Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	friedrich
Date/Time:	Sun, July 9, 2000 at 2:24 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	But ...
Message:
... but new fully open gtlds should also be considered and introduced together with the restricted ones.

Message Thread:

• ICANN Should Not Accept a .union TLD — Dan Yager, July 8 @ 4:59 PM (2/19)
• Orthogonal gTLDs — jaylev, July 10 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
• .union — fnord, July 8 @ 9:38 PM (1/17)
• What next: .church ? Who wants this ? — Venster, July 8 @ 11:26 PM (1/16)
• need for TLDs — fnord, July 9 @ 12:41 AM (3/15)
• Very true! — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:04 AM (0/0)
• Contradiction — 410, July 9 @ 1:28 AM (1/2)
• miscommunication — fnord, July 9 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)
• Where did we go wrong?  <sob> — 410, July 9 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)
• TLD themes — 410, July 9 @ 1:16 AM (2/10)
• I think Gary wants to solve the trademark problem by introducing new open gtlds ... — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:10 AM (1/4)
• not exactly — fnord, July 9 @ 2:09 PM (2/3)
• Logical answer to all TM problems — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 2:39 PM (1/1)
• fame — fnord, July 9 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
• But ... — friedrich, July 9 @ 2:24 PM (0/0)
• differentiation — fnord, July 9 @ 2:13 AM (1/4)
• I am running out of titles for these posts. . . Heehee — 410, July 9 @ 3:10 AM (1/3)
• ditto :) — fnord, July 9 @ 3:26 AM (1/2)
• So three TLDs walk into a bar. And the bartenders says to the first one. . . — 410, July 9 @ 3:49 AM (1/1)
• ...are you com, net, or org, you look so much alike — fnord, July 9 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy