Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
Venster |
| Date/Time: |
Tue, July 11, 2000 at 1:10 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.61 using XWindows/FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
Bible or Bill? |
Message: |
|
|
"AT&T supports a preemption process by which famous
trademark holders are allowed to preemptively register their marks in any new
TLDs. We appreciate that this is highly controversial; however, we consider it important
to limit the unneeded initial conflicts in any new name space." So you are advocating
that word.web, word.info, word.biz, and "word" in *any* other TLD, including non-commercial
ones, will be available to MicroSoft first? Only and only if they don't want it,
a religious movement of 2000 years standing may have a grab?
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- AT&T’s Comments to ICANN’s June 13, 2000 Request for Comment — Nakia, July 11 @ 12:40 AM (7/25)
- TODAY'S PROBLEMS WERE YESTERDAY'S SOLUTIONS — aligator, July 12 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, July 11 @ 2:43 AM (1/3)
- ATT your a Joke — Merlin, July 11 @ 2:20 AM (2/2)
- are we talking about the wame world - happy you are late — jefsey, July 11 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
- DAVID AND GOLIATH SHAKE HANDS :-) [ ATT, A GIANT, AND MYSELF, A PLAIN FOLK, HAVE THE SAME ANSWERS] — Nestor DR, July 11 @ 2:14 AM (2/4)
- Where was AT&T before on this board---discussing the issues — Gregory Krajewski, July 11 @ 1:11 AM (1/9)
- Bible or Bill? — Venster, July 11 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy