Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
bigtymer |
| Date/Time: |
Tue, July 11, 2000 at 1:39 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.73 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
I understand, but... |
Message: |
|
|
I guess I understand why you would want the "big boys" to have participated more
in this forum, but it's totally understandable why they didn't. When you have a company
with 10s of 1000s of employees it can take awhile to come to a consensus and official
position for the company. And to be honest, I really don't think the forum was
very productive for most of this time. For the most part, there was a bunch of name
calling and a big fight between people who want IOD because they have preregistrations
there and people who didn't preregister and don't want preregistrations. Throw in
a few allusions to the New World Order and you've pretty much got a forum that no
respectable company would want to participate in anyway.
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- AT&T’s Comments to ICANN’s June 13, 2000 Request for Comment — Nakia, July 11 @ 12:40 AM (7/25)
- TODAY'S PROBLEMS WERE YESTERDAY'S SOLUTIONS — aligator, July 12 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, July 11 @ 2:43 AM (1/3)
- ATT your a Joke — Merlin, July 11 @ 2:20 AM (2/2)
- are we talking about the wame world - happy you are late — jefsey, July 11 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
- DAVID AND GOLIATH SHAKE HANDS :-) [ ATT, A GIANT, AND MYSELF, A PLAIN FOLK, HAVE THE SAME ANSWERS] — Nestor DR, July 11 @ 2:14 AM (2/4)
- Where was AT&T before on this board---discussing the issues — Gregory Krajewski, July 11 @ 1:11 AM (1/9)
- I understand, but... — bigtymer, July 11 @ 1:39 AM (3/8)
- Bible or Bill? — Venster, July 11 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy