<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] Objectives description
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objectives description
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 08:20:08 -0500
> > Objective 2: to examine current gTLD contracts and practices approved
> > by ICANN staff and determine if any of them are outside the current
> > policy framework regarding vertical integration, and, if so make
> > recommendations as to how to respond to these exceptions.
>
> I think we need an objective 1a: That asks:
>
> 1a. Does the recommendation made in DAGv3 meet the criteria of that clear
> direction. If not, make recommendations on how those criteria can be met.
>
Ok, no disagreement here, just an observation that my "objective 2" was
intended to do the same thing that your 1a seems to be intended to do. So can
call your "1a" Objective #2 and delete the other one? The fewer and more
compact the objectives the better.
--MM
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|