Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
dotLawInc |
Date/Time: |
Thu, October 26, 2000 at 3:42 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.7 using Windows NT |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Clarifications for a Concerned Reviewer |
Message: |
|
dotlaw,Inc. appreciates that a cursory review of a proposal to sponsor and manage
a new restricted professional domain might initially foster concerns about the control
and authority over a potentially valuable public Internet resource. However
the details in our application outline the thought behind the structure we are proposing
to address these concerns for the legal profession, the public, and ICANN.
Allow us to illustrate some of these clarifications for you.
The concept of developing a dedicated top level domain (TLD) for the legal
profession came directly from the personal and professional experiences of the two
founders. Henderson is routinely engaged by lawyers in his consulting practice
of forensic accounting and litigation and knows first hand the consequences of having
the resources of legal profession scattered across several unregulated domains.
Fonger, from the vantage point of the medical profession, has come to appreciate
how similar issues within the medical space are currently being successfully addressed
using a sponsored and managed top level domain developed by dotMD,Inc. (www.thedomain.MD).
As noted in section C3 of the Sponsoring Organization Proposal, dotLaw,Inc. will
be run by lawyers, advised by lawyers, and guided by lawyers on the Domain Advisory
Board. The CEO search currently underway has identified several senior
lawyers of stature within the legal community who have a broad knowledge of the Internet.
The CEO decision will be made shortly. Further hiring of lawyers with expertise
for their respective roles within dotLaw, Inc. will be done by the CEO and will understandably
await an approval of the dotLaw application. The first priority of ICANN in their
"Criteria for Assessing TLD Proposals" is to "preserve the stability of the Internet"
while offering creative solutions to the current TLD environment. The reality
is that a well-run registry with a responsible and effective sponsoring organization
is a huge fiscal and organizational undertaking. Although .law domain registrations
will be competitively offered by many different licensed registrars, the single sponsoring
registry must well organized, funded, and supported. Therefore large businesses
have been necessary to properly handle these domain registries in the past and will
be required to reliably handle them in the future. .dotLaw, Inc. has been structured
to meet the fudiciary and fiscal responsibilities of a sponsoring organization. This
fiscal reality does not mean that .law will cease to meet the needs of the overall
legal profession. In section C3 of the Sponsoring Organization Proposal we
outline the structure for the .law Domain Advisory Board which is to be composed
of broad representation from all aspects of the legal profession. This includes
representatives from the ABA and various bar associations who have actually been
very receptive to our proposal and are currently reviewing our plan within their
organizations. dotLaw Inc. plans to take the lead of this Domain Advisory Board
for policy formulation, domain functionality, and dispute resolution in addition
to its negotiations on these issues with ICANN. The Domain Advisory Board and
dotLaw,Inc. will also be advised by the law firm of Latham and Watkins as noted in
the fiscal Exhibit A of the Sponsoring Organization Proposal. They have one
of the largest legal experiences in domain policy management and international
Internet name dispute resolution issues. A domain monopoly will not be possible
under this structure, which we feel should also address your policy formulation concerns
under section 7 of the "Criteria for Assessing TLD Proposals". The allocation of
names and addresses is clearly central to the function of any domain. Registrants
will be able to register a simple .law address or subscribe to the unique functionality
of the "individualized dynamic professional portal" to establish a full professional
web presence. Those who choose the portal will by definition have their content
displayed within the structured portal template that facilitates this enhanced functionality. Holding
back certain legal subject names by dotLaw,Inc. is key to the concept of managing
the quality and organization of the legal content on the .law domain. These
domain names will not be sold, rather they will be used by dotLaw, Inc. in administering
the domain. This generalized subject content will be written by lawyers for
both lawyers and the public and these subject names are not for sale. Unauthorized
resale or auctioning of any names will be prohibited to maintain fairness and consistency
within the domain and to discourage abusive registration practices (i.e. cyber squatting)
as called for in section 8 of the "Criteria for Assessing TLD Proposals", another
area of your concern. This policy is directly counter to a profit motive but
rather consistent with management of the domain. DotLaw,Inc. plans to develop
and manage .law in the best interests of the international legal community under
the direction of a Domain Advisory Board drawn directly from the legal community.
Your interest in our initiative is exactly the type of feedback we will need to the
Domain Advisory Board as we move forward with .law. We hope this clarification
more accurately outlines our vision and how we plan to ensure .law is a representative,
reliable, and innovative improvement over the current fragmented and inconsistent
multiple TLD legal space on the Internet. Respectfully submitted, dotLaw,Inc.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .law Application by dotlaw, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)
- Dot Law is a great idea GrassHMC, November 6 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
- Good Concept spw, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- .law great idea bmw, November 5 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
- .law application by dotlaw, Inc. SoCalLawyer, November 5 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
- I vote YES for .law !! DK, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- The Moldovan Connection rarmstrong, November 5 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time gerdan, November 5 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- .law application tbing1, November 5 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
- good idea patk, November 5 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea!! Law Dude, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- Pro .law electrolex, November 5 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- makes sense hgmobile, November 5 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
- Much Needed! rigtyme, November 5 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
- Wonderful idea golaw, November 5 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- Marvellous swiv, November 5 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
- The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! Larry Rossomondo, November 5 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw is good idea lawstudent, November 5 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload Tamie Leckemby, November 5 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
- Great Idea jolly, November 5 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- Dot-law a very good idea! thalernd, November 4 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
- support for dot-law johnsonbx, November 4 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw for Law Schools saama, November 4 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
- Support for DotLaw charriman, November 4 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)
- Support allen@pwc, November 4 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- comments joematerazo, November 4 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- .law g_davis, November 4 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw promotes the public welfare LloydRandolph, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
- Comments of John F. McClatchey John F. McClatchey, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (1/1)
- Comment Mark J. Pandiscio, November 4 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw Helps International Legal Community Heli Rostami, November 4 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
- Dot.Law Jemmil, November 4 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw sbhans, November 4 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
- well done! adavis1990, November 4 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- merits of dotlaw Ruth, November 3 @ 11:56 PM (1/1)
- .law JAKauerauf, November 3 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law proposal bmcarson, November 3 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- tld.law Hilton, November 3 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw pkalb, November 3 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain tfb212, November 3 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
- domain Alexlaw, November 3 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain lawyer212, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
- .law wjk, November 3 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
- .law Bert Foer, November 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
- support ptc, November 3 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw NPC122, November 3 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
- dot-law hgwinnell, November 3 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- Support for Dot.law Bradleymcc, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- .law domain lgibbes, November 3 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- The "dotLaw" Registration MFrank, November 3 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- .lawdomain hhooper, November 3 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- .law mandy, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- .law kiersten, November 3 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
- .law MikeC, November 3 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
- Comment on .Law lil, November 3 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative grandpooba, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
- We need this. roemer, November 3 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw, Inc. dallasJR3, November 3 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
- Real useful idea bison, November 3 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
- .law marksamuels, November 3 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
- .Law Domain MGardberg, November 3 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)
- good idea jhkinrich, November 3 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .law B.Taylor, November 3 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
- .law = user friendly internet katempp98, November 3 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
- dot law important idea donneri, November 3 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
- comments sfriedman, November 3 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
- Simple, Easier Web Navigation mvmiller, November 3 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law h.art.jonasson, November 3 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
- .law NDW, November 3 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw estradal, November 3 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
- dotlawdomain RFS, November 3 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP dhooker, November 3 @ 4:04 PM (3/3)
- application of dotLaw christine, November 3 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
- Smart Start StarDream, November 3 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
- .law Amy, November 3 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
- comment.law Lori J. McGuire, November 3 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
- good concept steven16, November 3 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw Lobbyist, November 3 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw szlezinger, November 3 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw drosenberg, November 3 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
- .law zimmermc, November 3 @ 2:52 PM (1/1)
- Support for .law bfwebster, November 3 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
- the law domain paria, November 3 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
- DOTLAW dudey, November 3 @ 2:02 PM (1/1)
- .law is a great idea daimonic, November 3 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw = a much needed service rargyle, November 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
- .law domain Coralie Matayoshi, November 2 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- .law Reggie, November 2 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- good idea leevogel, November 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw unclebill, November 2 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw furlong, November 2 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
- .law mbr, November 2 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative trepped, November 2 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
- .law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? JPA, November 2 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- domain lawrence, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- .law domain corytodd, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- In Support of DotLaw iow4f, November 2 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
- Useful tool swter, November 2 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
- .law mmcburney, November 2 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
- Dot Law Application jimzangaro, November 2 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
- .law cumbow, November 2 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Needed help grezl, November 2 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
- .law riker, November 2 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- .law yeats, November 2 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw ICANN application mfnlaw, November 2 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
- Comments on website CindiE, November 2 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
- comments on dotlaw proposal wmakena, November 2 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw proposal techentin, November 2 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain jpditty, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- .law mtobiason, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- A useful proposal MaryCheryl, November 2 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
- .law domain cholise, November 2 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
- Feedback on .law Deb, November 2 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw rsmyers, November 2 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
- Dispute resolution Morrissey, November 2 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
- support for the .law concept dakin-grimm, November 2 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
- .law MELISSA, November 2 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw jeremyleon, November 2 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
- Dot.Law FamLaw, November 2 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw scrane, November 1 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw ddunham, November 1 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw Amy McCurdy, November 1 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
- A Great Idea mrscott, November 1 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- comments aj, November 1 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
- Comment vanhuysen, November 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw application tommyg2230, November 1 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- Comment vap613, November 1 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea MDVACH, November 1 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- .law domain david quinto, November 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- .law URL rhenneke, November 1 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Message jmaz91578, November 1 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
- Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)
- International View Gavin, November 1 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
- .law is a great idea audi3, November 1 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
- Great IDEA!!! ninaesq, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Vote for dotLaw Markroth, October 31 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- Vote for DotLaw linden, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Comment Jim1, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Very Helpful kevinfl, October 31 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
- .law domain gm1, October 31 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw TLD Segman, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
- Reaction aterry, October 31 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw nmcs, October 31 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)
- comment mungar, October 31 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- Great idea jpirone, October 31 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
- .law is a good idea inhousec, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- good idea madlin, October 31 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
- Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" yasmine saadat, October 31 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
- Yes to DotLaw ssinger, October 31 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
- Strong support for .law comanche, October 31 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- Definite YES for dotLaw krasmussen, October 31 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
- Enthusiastic support for dotLaw Vig Mangasarian, October 31 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw domain name rcb, October 30 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
- .law domain rm1, October 30 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- .law RM1, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
- .LAW DFG1, October 30 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain.net Hollywood , October 30 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- Domain .law is a Great Idea! jake, October 30 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, inc. a welcome site! fthompson, October 30 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- Yes to .law, brilliant idea Soussan Saadat, October 30 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- proposal feedback mrb, October 30 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)
- REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)
- Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)
- Application of dot law Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)
- Proposal lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy