Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
dotLawInc |
Date/Time: |
Sun, November 5, 2000 at 6:28 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.7 using Windows NT |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Re: Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP |
Message: |
|
We have read and appreciate the input of Mr. David Hooker,
Managing Partner of Thompson Hine & Flory, LLP. However, in considering
these comments, we believe the following additional points should be considered.
As part of dotLaw's fiduciary responsibilities of being a sponsored domain, we will
obtain input from the legal community, ensure the interest of the profession and
the Internet public will be adequately represented and have appropriate consideration
of current ethical guidance's and regulations of the profession. We will accomplish
this responsibility by hiring a management team with legal backgrounds (e.g., our
CEO will have a law background). A Domain Advisory Board made up of representatives
from the legal community will support our management team. You can view an
outline of the board structure on our website, www.thelawdomain.net. We
view this board as critical to meeting the needs of the domain community and the
success of .law. We are actively having discussions with various individuals
and associations as to membership on this Board. Specifically, we have
had several discussions with the American Bar Association and recently, at their
request, submitted a proposal outlining the structure for their involvement in the
domain. We also sent letters to all state bar associations introducing the
dotlaw proposal, requesting their input on the application process and additional
input on an on-going basis should we be awarded the contract by ICANN. The
items outlined above are our plans for the domain. We have already begun the
process of obtaining input by establishing an interim advisory group made up of attorneys
from across the country to provide dotLaw with input on issues such as domain structure,
ethical guidelines, content structure and how best to obtain input from the various
members of the legal community. We understand your concern about time for adequate
input, but this timing is driven by ICANN. However, as stated in the application,
we are proposing a start up period of six months to allow us time for adequate input
and to structure this domain for the benefit of the legal profession. Accomplishing
the objectives of a professional sponsored/ restricted domain will require substantial
capital investment and the hiring of a top caliber management team. The legal
community is a demanding group and will require the highest level of quality.
To meet the on-going needs of the community will require a team of professionals
and on-going investment in product development. We believe this is best accomplished
through a for profit structure that will be able to obtain investment capital and
offer compensation packages to attract the management talent this domain will demand.
Inherent in the success of this domain as in any business is that you must meet the
needs of your customer with the quality they expect. As a final point, dotlaw is
not and will not be providing legal services. dotLaw, Inc. is being established
to provide a service to the legal community not to sell legal services.
Our domain policies and contractual arrangements with ICANN will govern the purpose
and scope of services provided by dotLaw. These policies and the goals of ICANN
are intended and focused on the running of a domain registry not providing professional
services. FAS-Pwc's primary market and clients are law firms. Law firms
engage FAS-PWC to provide assistance as required by clients and as directed by counsel.
FAS-Pwc is not in the business of providing legal services, but rather consulting
services to the legal profession. We respectively submit these additional comments
for your consideration. DotLaw, Inc.
|
| |
Link: |
dotLaw, Inc. |
Message Thread:
- .law Application by dotlaw, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)
- Dot Law is a great idea GrassHMC, November 6 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
- Good Concept spw, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- .law great idea bmw, November 5 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
- .law application by dotlaw, Inc. SoCalLawyer, November 5 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
- I vote YES for .law !! DK, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- The Moldovan Connection rarmstrong, November 5 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time gerdan, November 5 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- .law application tbing1, November 5 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
- good idea patk, November 5 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea!! Law Dude, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- Pro .law electrolex, November 5 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- makes sense hgmobile, November 5 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
- Much Needed! rigtyme, November 5 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
- Wonderful idea golaw, November 5 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- Marvellous swiv, November 5 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
- The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! Larry Rossomondo, November 5 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw is good idea lawstudent, November 5 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload Tamie Leckemby, November 5 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
- Great Idea jolly, November 5 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- Dot-law a very good idea! thalernd, November 4 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
- support for dot-law johnsonbx, November 4 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw for Law Schools saama, November 4 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
- Support for DotLaw charriman, November 4 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)
- Support allen@pwc, November 4 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- comments joematerazo, November 4 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- .law g_davis, November 4 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw promotes the public welfare LloydRandolph, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
- Comments of John F. McClatchey John F. McClatchey, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (1/1)
- Comment Mark J. Pandiscio, November 4 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw Helps International Legal Community Heli Rostami, November 4 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
- Dot.Law Jemmil, November 4 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw sbhans, November 4 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
- well done! adavis1990, November 4 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- merits of dotlaw Ruth, November 3 @ 11:56 PM (1/1)
- .law JAKauerauf, November 3 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law proposal bmcarson, November 3 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- tld.law Hilton, November 3 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw pkalb, November 3 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain tfb212, November 3 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
- domain Alexlaw, November 3 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain lawyer212, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
- .law wjk, November 3 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
- .law Bert Foer, November 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
- support ptc, November 3 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw NPC122, November 3 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
- dot-law hgwinnell, November 3 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- Support for Dot.law Bradleymcc, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- .law domain lgibbes, November 3 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- The "dotLaw" Registration MFrank, November 3 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- .lawdomain hhooper, November 3 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- .law mandy, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- .law kiersten, November 3 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
- .law MikeC, November 3 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
- Comment on .Law lil, November 3 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative grandpooba, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
- We need this. roemer, November 3 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw, Inc. dallasJR3, November 3 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
- Real useful idea bison, November 3 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
- .law marksamuels, November 3 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
- .Law Domain MGardberg, November 3 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)
- good idea jhkinrich, November 3 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .law B.Taylor, November 3 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
- .law = user friendly internet katempp98, November 3 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
- dot law important idea donneri, November 3 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
- comments sfriedman, November 3 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
- Simple, Easier Web Navigation mvmiller, November 3 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law h.art.jonasson, November 3 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
- .law NDW, November 3 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw estradal, November 3 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
- dotlawdomain RFS, November 3 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP dhooker, November 3 @ 4:04 PM (3/3)
- application of dotLaw christine, November 3 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
- Smart Start StarDream, November 3 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
- .law Amy, November 3 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
- comment.law Lori J. McGuire, November 3 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
- good concept steven16, November 3 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw Lobbyist, November 3 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw szlezinger, November 3 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw drosenberg, November 3 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
- .law zimmermc, November 3 @ 2:52 PM (1/1)
- Support for .law bfwebster, November 3 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
- the law domain paria, November 3 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
- DOTLAW dudey, November 3 @ 2:02 PM (1/1)
- .law is a great idea daimonic, November 3 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw = a much needed service rargyle, November 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
- .law domain Coralie Matayoshi, November 2 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- .law Reggie, November 2 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- good idea leevogel, November 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw unclebill, November 2 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw furlong, November 2 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
- .law mbr, November 2 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative trepped, November 2 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
- .law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? JPA, November 2 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- domain lawrence, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- .law domain corytodd, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- In Support of DotLaw iow4f, November 2 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
- Useful tool swter, November 2 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
- .law mmcburney, November 2 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
- Dot Law Application jimzangaro, November 2 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
- .law cumbow, November 2 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Needed help grezl, November 2 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
- .law riker, November 2 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- .law yeats, November 2 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw ICANN application mfnlaw, November 2 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
- Comments on website CindiE, November 2 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
- comments on dotlaw proposal wmakena, November 2 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw proposal techentin, November 2 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain jpditty, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- .law mtobiason, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- A useful proposal MaryCheryl, November 2 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
- .law domain cholise, November 2 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
- Feedback on .law Deb, November 2 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw rsmyers, November 2 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
- Dispute resolution Morrissey, November 2 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
- support for the .law concept dakin-grimm, November 2 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
- .law MELISSA, November 2 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw jeremyleon, November 2 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
- Dot.Law FamLaw, November 2 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw scrane, November 1 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw ddunham, November 1 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw Amy McCurdy, November 1 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
- A Great Idea mrscott, November 1 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- comments aj, November 1 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
- Comment vanhuysen, November 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw application tommyg2230, November 1 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- Comment vap613, November 1 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea MDVACH, November 1 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- .law domain david quinto, November 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- .law URL rhenneke, November 1 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Message jmaz91578, November 1 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
- Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)
- International View Gavin, November 1 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
- .law is a great idea audi3, November 1 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
- Great IDEA!!! ninaesq, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Vote for dotLaw Markroth, October 31 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- Vote for DotLaw linden, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Comment Jim1, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Very Helpful kevinfl, October 31 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
- .law domain gm1, October 31 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw TLD Segman, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
- Reaction aterry, October 31 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw nmcs, October 31 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)
- comment mungar, October 31 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- Great idea jpirone, October 31 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
- .law is a good idea inhousec, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- good idea madlin, October 31 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
- Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" yasmine saadat, October 31 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
- Yes to DotLaw ssinger, October 31 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
- Strong support for .law comanche, October 31 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- Definite YES for dotLaw krasmussen, October 31 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
- Enthusiastic support for dotLaw Vig Mangasarian, October 31 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw domain name rcb, October 30 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
- .law domain rm1, October 30 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- .law RM1, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
- .LAW DFG1, October 30 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain.net Hollywood , October 30 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- Domain .law is a Great Idea! jake, October 30 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, inc. a welcome site! fthompson, October 30 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- Yes to .law, brilliant idea Soussan Saadat, October 30 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- proposal feedback mrb, October 30 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)
- REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)
- Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)
- Application of dot law Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)
- Proposal lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy