Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
retronics1 |
Date/Time: |
Sat, October 28, 2000 at 6:39 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal |
Message: |
|
Although I would love to see a .law TLD, I would be very
distressed to see DotLaw Inc as the registrar. I find DotLaw Inc's Proposal
to be extremely offensive. They are attempting to "REGULATE" who says and does
what on the internet. That goes against the very grain of the internet. For
this company and it's founders to believe that they have the right to be the POLICE
for .LAW or any other TLD is unbelievable. Please read the following it is from
there internet site http://thelawdomain.net/ ================================================== In
contrast, the .law domain will be planned, populated and managed from its inception.
dotLaw's registration, content and management policies aim to ensure .law domain
integrity and a focus on reliable and comprehensive law related content. Click here
to see the proposed topography of the .law domain (large image file). Names that
are registered in the .law domain will be classified into one of several name categories.
Applications in each category are subject to a unique verification process. The domain
name categories under .law will include: Law Firm A domain name for a law firm,
for example SmithJones.law. Applicants for these domain names will be verified as
authorized representatives of their firms. Attorney A domain name for an
individual attorney, for example JohnQSmith.law. Registration applications for these
names will be subject to verification and proof of licensure. Legal Association
A domain name for a law related association. For example aba.law. Applicants
for these domain names will be verified as authorized representatives of their organizations.
Vendor A domain name for a company that provides legal services such as research,
court reporting, trial graphics, and expert witness services. An example name of
this type might be trialgraphics.law. Verification of applications for these type
of names will include confirmation of their business purpose for the legal community.
Keyword A domain name from a reserved list of legal keywords. For example
trusts.law. These keyword sites will be a source of complete, unbiased, accurate
and timely content related to the subject. Sponsoring and publishing content in these
sites will be reserved for individuals or organizations with respected authority
on the subject. Community Geography based sub domain names. These sites will
contain locally orientated content. The .law MetaDirectory A key component
of the .law domain will be the domain MetaDirectory. The MetaDirectory can be thought
of as a keyword cross-index with data from every site registered in the domain. MetaDirectory
entries are created each time a new domain is created under the TLD. It will be updated
at regular intervals adding, deleting and modifying entries based on changes in domain
content. The MetaDirectory links attorneys to other attorneys, geographic areas
and firms to their areas of expertise or specialty. The MetaDirectory inverts
those links as well, linking content on particular subjects to particular attorneys,
firms, associations and vendors in particular geographic regions. Certain reserved
sites in the domain will contain data from the MetaDirectory in addition to their
primary content. For example in addition to non-biased information on trusts, www.trusts.law
will contain auto generated content from the MetaDirectory that links to attorneys
and firms that specialize in trusts. It will also auto-link to geographically specific
trust related content ======================================= Again
I will say this company has NO business being a Registrar of TLD'S. The way
in which they wish to REGULATE who gets a TLD from them goes against current Supreme
Court Rulings that have been made. I would love to see ICANN authorize the
companies that are currently Registrars of TLD'S to add .LAW to their inventory.
But,
if it is a choice between NO .law or a .law GOVERNED by DotLAw Inc then the choice
is EASY. No .law at all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .law Application by dotlaw, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)
- Dot Law is a great idea GrassHMC, November 6 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
- Good Concept spw, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- .law great idea bmw, November 5 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
- .law application by dotlaw, Inc. SoCalLawyer, November 5 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
- I vote YES for .law !! DK, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- The Moldovan Connection rarmstrong, November 5 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time gerdan, November 5 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- .law application tbing1, November 5 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
- good idea patk, November 5 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea!! Law Dude, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- Pro .law electrolex, November 5 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- makes sense hgmobile, November 5 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
- Much Needed! rigtyme, November 5 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
- Wonderful idea golaw, November 5 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- Marvellous swiv, November 5 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
- The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! Larry Rossomondo, November 5 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw is good idea lawstudent, November 5 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload Tamie Leckemby, November 5 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
- Great Idea jolly, November 5 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- Dot-law a very good idea! thalernd, November 4 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
- support for dot-law johnsonbx, November 4 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw for Law Schools saama, November 4 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
- Support for DotLaw charriman, November 4 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)
- Support allen@pwc, November 4 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- comments joematerazo, November 4 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
- .law g_davis, November 4 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw promotes the public welfare LloydRandolph, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
- Comments of John F. McClatchey John F. McClatchey, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (1/1)
- Comment Mark J. Pandiscio, November 4 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw Helps International Legal Community Heli Rostami, November 4 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
- Dot.Law Jemmil, November 4 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw sbhans, November 4 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
- well done! adavis1990, November 4 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- merits of dotlaw Ruth, November 3 @ 11:56 PM (1/1)
- .law JAKauerauf, November 3 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law proposal bmcarson, November 3 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- tld.law Hilton, November 3 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw pkalb, November 3 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain tfb212, November 3 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
- domain Alexlaw, November 3 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- in favor of .law domain lawyer212, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
- .law wjk, November 3 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
- .law Bert Foer, November 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
- support ptc, November 3 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw NPC122, November 3 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
- dot-law hgwinnell, November 3 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- Support for Dot.law Bradleymcc, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- .law domain lgibbes, November 3 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- The "dotLaw" Registration MFrank, November 3 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- .lawdomain hhooper, November 3 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- .law mandy, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- .law kiersten, November 3 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
- .law MikeC, November 3 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
- Comment on .Law lil, November 3 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative grandpooba, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
- We need this. roemer, November 3 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- DotLaw, Inc. dallasJR3, November 3 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
- Real useful idea bison, November 3 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
- .law marksamuels, November 3 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
- .Law Domain MGardberg, November 3 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)
- good idea jhkinrich, November 3 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .law B.Taylor, November 3 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
- .law = user friendly internet katempp98, November 3 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
- dot law important idea donneri, November 3 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
- comments sfriedman, November 3 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
- Simple, Easier Web Navigation mvmiller, November 3 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Support for .law h.art.jonasson, November 3 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
- .law NDW, November 3 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw estradal, November 3 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
- dotlawdomain RFS, November 3 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP dhooker, November 3 @ 4:04 PM (3/3)
- application of dotLaw christine, November 3 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
- Smart Start StarDream, November 3 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
- .law Amy, November 3 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
- comment.law Lori J. McGuire, November 3 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
- good concept steven16, November 3 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw Lobbyist, November 3 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw szlezinger, November 3 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw drosenberg, November 3 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
- .law zimmermc, November 3 @ 2:52 PM (1/1)
- Support for .law bfwebster, November 3 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
- the law domain paria, November 3 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
- DOTLAW dudey, November 3 @ 2:02 PM (1/1)
- .law is a great idea daimonic, November 3 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw = a much needed service rargyle, November 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
- .law domain Coralie Matayoshi, November 2 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- .law Reggie, November 2 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- good idea leevogel, November 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw unclebill, November 2 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw furlong, November 2 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
- .law mbr, November 2 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- .law e-mail initiative trepped, November 2 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
- .law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? JPA, November 2 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- domain lawrence, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- .law domain corytodd, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
- In Support of DotLaw iow4f, November 2 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
- Useful tool swter, November 2 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
- .law mmcburney, November 2 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
- Dot Law Application jimzangaro, November 2 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
- .law cumbow, November 2 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Needed help grezl, November 2 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
- .law riker, November 2 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- .law yeats, November 2 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw ICANN application mfnlaw, November 2 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
- Comments on website CindiE, November 2 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
- comments on dotlaw proposal wmakena, November 2 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw proposal techentin, November 2 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain jpditty, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- .law mtobiason, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
- A useful proposal MaryCheryl, November 2 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
- .law domain cholise, November 2 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
- Feedback on .law Deb, November 2 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)
- dotLaw rsmyers, November 2 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
- Dispute resolution Morrissey, November 2 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
- support for the .law concept dakin-grimm, November 2 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
- .law MELISSA, November 2 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)
- Dotlaw jeremyleon, November 2 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
- Dot.Law FamLaw, November 2 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- dotlaw scrane, November 1 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw ddunham, November 1 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw Amy McCurdy, November 1 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
- A Great Idea mrscott, November 1 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
- comments aj, November 1 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
- Comment vanhuysen, November 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw application tommyg2230, November 1 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
- Comment vap613, November 1 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
- Great Idea MDVACH, November 1 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- .law domain david quinto, November 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- .law URL rhenneke, November 1 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Message jmaz91578, November 1 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
- Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)
- International View Gavin, November 1 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
- .law is a great idea audi3, November 1 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
- Great IDEA!!! ninaesq, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Vote for dotLaw Markroth, October 31 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- Vote for DotLaw linden, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Comment Jim1, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
- Very Helpful kevinfl, October 31 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
- .law domain gm1, October 31 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw TLD Segman, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
- Reaction aterry, October 31 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
- dotLaw nmcs, October 31 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)
- comment mungar, October 31 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- Great idea jpirone, October 31 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
- .law is a good idea inhousec, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- good idea madlin, October 31 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
- Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" yasmine saadat, October 31 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
- Yes to DotLaw ssinger, October 31 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
- Strong support for .law comanche, October 31 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- Definite YES for dotLaw krasmussen, October 31 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
- Enthusiastic support for dotLaw Vig Mangasarian, October 31 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
- dotLaw domain name rcb, October 30 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
- .law domain rm1, October 30 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- .law RM1, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
- .LAW DFG1, October 30 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)
- lawdomain.net Hollywood , October 30 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
- Domain .law is a Great Idea! jake, October 30 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, inc. a welcome site! fthompson, October 30 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- Yes to .law, brilliant idea Soussan Saadat, October 30 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- proposal feedback mrb, October 30 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)
- REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)
- Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)
- Application of dot law Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)
- Proposal lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy