Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gregory W. Krajewski
Date/Time:	Sun, November 12, 2000 at 11:40 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Sir you may want to check up on Tucows...
Message:
Sir, you said you didn't want any glitches on Day 1...Do you understand that Afilias has contracted out to Tucows for registry operations. ..Here is a statement by the reviewers...YOU study this issue yourself, and then decide who would be prepared on day 1, IOD or Tucows....Remember who has been testing, and preparing for this day (some 4 1/2 years)... http://www.icann.com/tlds/report/dir1.html (Dot Dir) "Since Tucows has not run a production TLD, there is some risk that they lack some skills required" (this was mentioned in another app)

Message Thread:

• IOD's huge merits, that Afilias can only dream of — fabrcop, November 11 @ 5:16 PM (1/22)
• ... that's why generic Internet users support IOD — fabrcop, November 11 @ 5:28 PM (1/21)
• What a joke! — kristopher, November 12 @ 6:56 AM (4/20)
• Sir you may want to check up on Tucows... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 12 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)
• please understand the magnitude of this - it's not IOD vs ICANN — sunshine, November 12 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• I may be a "funny guy" as you say, but I am still the "generic Internet user" — fabrcop, November 12 @ 8:27 AM (1/11)
• Statistics — kristopher, November 12 @ 8:47 AM (1/10)
• Sorry, I am a physicist, so I am supposed to know statistics very well... — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:09 AM (2/9)
• You prove my point! — kristopher, November 12 @ 9:45 AM (1/3)
• Final answer — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:59 AM (1/2)
• "I think that this forum is NOT a biased sample" — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:19 AM (1/1)
• Proofs of claims — cambler, November 12 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
• Rough evaluation — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:29 AM (1/4)
• You are a funny guy! — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:06 AM (1/3)
• Assumptions — fabrcop, November 12 @ 10:30 AM (1/2)
• *sigh* — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:43 AM (1/1)
• You're so right! — cambler, November 12 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• Sir, you're mistaken — cambler, November 12 @ 7:35 AM (1/5)
• No, no, no — kristopher, November 12 @ 7:55 AM (2/4)
• Thats the point — Anthony 2nd, November 12 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
• No? — cambler, November 12 @ 1:37 PM (1/2)
• What if... — kristopher, November 12 @ 8:20 PM (1/1)
• Yes, what if... — cambler, November 12 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy