Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
  
    | Username:  | 
    cgrady   | 
  
  
    | Date/Time:  | 
    Sat, October 14, 2000 at 1:05 AM GMT | 
  
  
    | Browser:  | 
    Netscape Communicator V4.75 using Windows NT  | 
  
  
    | Score:  | 
    5 | 
  
  
    | Subject:  | 
    My Letter to ICANN | 
  
  
     Message:  | 
       |   
  
    
 
 
 | 
        I thought I should post my initial letter to ICANN for
public record. ********************************** Ladies and Gentlemen of ICANN, I
am certain that this is a difficult and stressful time for you. I truly appreciate
your commitment to ICANN. Please accept my apologies in advance for adding to the
overflow of emails that you must already be receiving. However, I feel so strongly
about the upcoming review process that will take place that I felt the needed to
email you directly. I am taking this opportunity to voice my strongest endorsement
and support of Image Online, Inc., owner of www.webtld.com (the .WEB registry) 
I believe this organization, granted permission by IANA several years ago to establish
the .WEB registry, has shown superior customer support and handling of .WEB registrations. 
They have proven to me to have the capacity, know-how, and the existing stable 
infrastructure to support the .WEB initiative.  However, the strongest show of
support has been the more than 18,000+ names that have been registered and are currently
being managed in advance of final approval from ICANN. The open working relationship
between ICANN and entities that IANA granted permission to, for the establishment
and collection of proposed registry domain names, is of crucial importance to the
tempered expansion of the Internet and how it will be accessed, used, and accessible
in the future.  I feel that my letter of support also represents the thousands
of people who are more than satisfied with the way in which Image Online has more
than competently managed this process. Several years ago I stumbled upon the .WEB
registry at www.webtld.com completely by accident. I read Image Online's statement
regarding the permission given to them by IANA to establish the .WEB registry and
to begin accepting and managing registrations. Before registering a .WEB domain I
called and emailed ICANN to verify that IANA had indeed given this permission. ICANN
verified that IANA had given permission to Image Online several years prior to my
request. To date 18,000+ .WEB domain names have been registered. Translated this
means:  - Over 18,000+ times a person has risked their money based on IANA's
permission for Image Online to establish the .WEB tld  - Over 18,000+ times persons
invested, and continue to invest on a daily basis, in a company (Image Online) because
they provided a stable and safe system to register and manage domains, provided phone
support, answered email, and resolved the few problems or issues one had immediately,
many times while you were still on the phone. - Over 18,000+ times and actual
person, and not heavily backed domain squatters registered their .WEB domains. -
Over 18,000+ times people backed this alternative to .com, .net, and .org for themselves
and their clients 
 We knew that there was risk involved. We also knew that any
one of us, whether we had purchased a .WEB domain or not would have selected Image
Online to manage the .WEB registry simply because they had proven their complete
and total competence at establishing and managing the .WEB tld by providing unmatched
services and support (as well as a stable registry). They had successfully established
a domain management system the way it should be ...  something that Network
Solutions had not been able to do since the beginning and still has not accomplished
today. Having personally suffered through the tyranny of the Network Solutions
monopoly, an organization which I still jokingly refer to today (through my 1st amendment
right) as "The Poster Child for Abusive Monopolies", Image Online's .WEB registry,
though not live, has been a breath of fresh air (and all from a company that has
struggled for years with the delays resulting from IANA's re-organization into ICANN
and the subsequent re-alignment). While many organizations have submitted their
applications to establish top level domains, their proposals for applications are
somewhat irrelevant. The REAL and RELEVANT issues are: - that IANA did give permission
to Image Online to establish the .WEB tld many years ago. - that over 18,000+
times Image Online was elected by us, the users of the domain name system, every
time we paid our $35 registration for a .WEB domain name over the past several years. -
if Image Online was not every bit as qualified as I have mentioned above to manage
the already established .WEB tld registration system then they would have disappeared
a long time ago. - Image Online is still here, we still support them and it is
ICANN’s obligation to listen to us, the users of the Internet, the builders of the
Internet, the people at the mercy of the current domain name system and at the mercy
of ICANN's decisions. You must understand that the required $50,000 fee that accompanied
Image Onine’s application is not simply a fee that is backed by some large venture
capital firm. It was paid for by us, the users, in support of Image Online by our
18,000+ X $35 registration fees. It is the result of a free and open market ... the
way it should be. Please take this into consideration. On the Internet only the
organizations that provide a quality service, both physically and technically survive.
Organizations that fail to meet the end users standards quickly find that their customers
have gone elsewhere, often over night. This is the way it should be, WE the users
deciding what services we want and need and from what organizations. It is clear
that we have chosen, by sheer volume of existing registered domains, Image Online
to manage the .WEB registry. Image Online has more than demonstrated their capacity
to manage the .web registry and Internet users have more than begun to demonstrate
their interest in the .WEB domain as well as interacting with Image Online in support
of this process.  Kind Regards, Chris Grady President & CEO Vieodata,
Inc. chris@vieodata.com
 cc: Esther Dyson Jean Francois Abramatic Amadeu
Abril i Abril Robert Blokzijl Geraldine Capedeboscq Vinton G. Cerf  Jonathan
Cohen George Conrades Greg Crew Philip Davidson Frank Fitzsimmons Ken
Fockler Hans Kraaijenbrink Sang Hyun Kyong Jun Murai Alejandro Pisanty Michael
Roberts Helmut Schink Eugenio Triana Linda S. Wilson Pindar Wong Andrew
McLaughlin Louis Touton        
  
  |  
  |        | 
  
Message Thread:
  - .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry   Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
 
  
    - My final views on Image Online.   cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD is a globally recogized stable registry   Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
 
    
    - In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered".   friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
 
    - Say YES! to IOD   first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
 
    - Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law!   friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
 
    - DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
 
    - ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD issues   useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - Pioneer Preference is best way   netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
 
    - The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people   friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
 
    
    - Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application   dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
 
    - "Dirt in The Domain Name Game"   jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
 
    - NO !  to IOD  -  NO to .web   SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
 
    
      - You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
 
      - Say YES! to IOD :)   first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
 
      - Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth   Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
 
      - Still waiting for your answer to my comments.   friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
 
      - You make no Sense   Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
 
      - These allegations are, of course, false   cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
 
      
    
    - Letters in Support of IOD   jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web   pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
 
    - ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5   Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - IOD should run .WEB   H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON)   fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
 
    - ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5   saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
 
    - IOD has earned .WEB through hard work   ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
 
    - Summing it all up..   netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
 
    - Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD   JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
 
    - ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval   jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
 
    - CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application!   fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
 
    - What is the point of .web?   james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
 
    
    - IOD and the Texas republic   SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
 
    
    - Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO   worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
 
    - Alert:  Conflicts of Interest Addressed   VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - IOD application for .web makes sense to me   veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
 
    - Moral rights   fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
 
    - .............Why  IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why   y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
 
    - ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world   fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
 
    
    - Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web   mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
 
    
    - IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion   S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
 
    - Desperation   hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
 
    
    - IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption   pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence)   fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web?   lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI   ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
 
    - the jury will say no   SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
 
    
    - The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks"   TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
 
    - who had the original idea?   theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - ICANN vs IOD   Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
 
    - To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS.   IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
 
    
    - I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web   jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
 
    
    - Chris   CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
 
    - IOD, what does that stands for?   anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
 
    
    - IOD and Ken Stubbs   Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
 
    
    - Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read!   friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - The truth about .web (short version)   fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - The truth about .web (long version)   fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - The success of new TLDs rests right here...   Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof   Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
 
    
    - MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY.  PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!!   Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
 
    
    - .web is lousy proposal   SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
 
    
    - CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web   stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
 
    
    - IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out   GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
 
    
    - Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries   SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
 
    
    - When is the decision on .web going to be made?   VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - ....................Why IOD?  Over 20,017 Reasons why   Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
 
    - Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - Illusions   global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
 
    
    - Cyber Squatting   Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
 
    
    - IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE   dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
 
    - Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community   Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
 
    - Support of application for .web   gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
 
    - TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application.   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
 
    
    - The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD.....   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
 
    - .web opinion   Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
 
    - Give it to IOD   petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
 
    - Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business   mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
 
    
    - Dot Web Registry...   rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD is the best choice   weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign.....   ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
 
    - VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB.  A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY.  WAY TO GO IOD!!!   SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
 
    - I support Image Online for .web....   pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
 
    - I Support Image Online's .web application.   jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
 
    - Friend of a Competitive Internet.   jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
 
    - Internet  Stability  !?   stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - I support IOD's .web application.   markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
 
    - Playing fair   British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
 
    
      - tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them!   friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
 
      - OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK   pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
 
      - ICANN knows   BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
 
      
      - Squatted?   For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
 
      
      - The Beginnning   For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
 
    
    - Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web   fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
 
    - To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
 
    
    - To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
 
    
    - TO ICANN:  This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH...   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
 
    
      - Support of IOD   jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
 
      - Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias   worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
 
      - In support of IOD and the .web appliation   Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
 
      - I Support Dot Web and IOD   jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
 
      - Manufacturer Supports .WEB   pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
 
      - Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support...   AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
 
      
      - A non .web registrant in support of IOD   md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
 
      - I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry   fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
 
      - Support IOD   first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
 
      - IODesign is most deserving of .web   .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
 
      - I support .web and IOD, because...   saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
 
      
      - Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly!   Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
 
      - IOD supporter   enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
 
      - I support IODs application for .web   friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
 
      - I support .web and IOD   treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
 
      
      - I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE!   Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
 
      - I Support Dot Web and IOD   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
 
      - .web network   liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
 
    
    - Has the creation of  AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels?   friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
 
    - Full support of IO Designs .web application   friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
 
    - IOD Application   Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
 
    - Interlecuctal property is protected   doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ?   TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
 
    
    - THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN   TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
 
    
    - I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD   fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
 
    - K.I.S.S.   debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
 
    
    - IODesign's .WEB Application   SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD .WEB BID  -  SUPPORT   Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
 
    - A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN   For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
 
    - IOD Lawsuit against IANA   jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD   Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
 
    
    - TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:  Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
 
    
    - IOD congratulations! A job well done!   first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
 
    - I'm Interested.   Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest   Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
 
    - Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs!   jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
 
    
    - Online Design has worked hard from 1995...   support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
 
    - rules for .web tld   jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
 
    - Come on! Lets have a decent argument!   anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
 
    - Vote of confidence in IOD and .web   anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
 
    - WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!!   cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
 
    
    - My .web comments for ICANN   BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
 
    
    - Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy   RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - Give IOD the .Web Registration   Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
 
    - IODESIGN'S .Web Registration   Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
 
    - My Letter to ICANN   cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:   Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
 
    
    - MORE DISCUSSION     http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/   BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
 
    - After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices   saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign   fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
 
    
    - What's that Afilias.TV site about??   spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
 
    
    - Previous Post about IOD and .Web   Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
 
    
    - Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest?   Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
 
    
    - Serious doubts   JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
 
    
    - .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner   Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
 
    
  
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy