Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	rcb
Date/Time:	Mon, October 30, 2000 at 10:24 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	dotLaw domain name
Message:
This is a wonderful idea.  ICANN should approve this application.

Message Thread:

• .law Application by dotlaw, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)
• Dot Law is a great idea — GrassHMC, November 6 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
• Good Concept — spw, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
• .law great idea — bmw, November 5 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
• .law application by dotlaw, Inc. — SoCalLawyer, November 5 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
• I vote YES for .law !! — DK, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
• The Moldovan Connection — rarmstrong, November 5 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time — gerdan, November 5 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
• .law application — tbing1, November 5 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
• good idea — patk, November 5 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
• Great Idea!! — Law Dude, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
• Pro .law — electrolex, November 5 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
• makes sense — hgmobile, November 5 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
• Much Needed! — rigtyme, November 5 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
• Wonderful idea — golaw, November 5 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
• Marvellous — swiv, November 5 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
• The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! — Larry Rossomondo, November 5 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw is good idea — lawstudent, November 5 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
• Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload — Tamie Leckemby, November 5 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
• Great Idea — jolly, November 5 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
• Dot-law a very good idea! — thalernd, November 4 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
• support for dot-law — johnsonbx, November 4 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw for Law Schools — saama, November 4 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
• Support for DotLaw — charriman, November 4 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)
• Support — allen@pwc, November 4 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
• comments — joematerazo, November 4 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
• .law — g_davis, November 4 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw promotes the public welfare — LloydRandolph, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
• Comments of John F. McClatchey — John F. McClatchey, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (1/1)
• Welcomed Further Input From The Legal Profession! — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
• Comment — Mark J. Pandiscio, November 4 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw Helps International Legal Community — Heli Rostami, November 4 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
• Dot.Law — Jemmil, November 4 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw — sbhans, November 4 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
• well done! — adavis1990, November 4 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
• merits of dotlaw — Ruth, November 3 @ 11:56 PM (1/1)
• Good law — Ruth, November 3 @ 11:57 PM (0/0)
• .law — JAKauerauf, November 3 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law proposal — bmcarson, November 3 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
• tld.law — Hilton, November 3 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — pkalb, November 3 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
• in favor of .law domain — tfb212, November 3 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
• domain — Alexlaw, November 3 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
• in favor of .law domain — lawyer212, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
• .law — wjk, November 3 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• .law — Bert Foer, November 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
• support — ptc, November 3 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — NPC122, November 3 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
• dot-law — hgwinnell, November 3 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
• Support for Dot.law — Bradleymcc, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — lgibbes, November 3 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
• The "dotLaw" Registration — MFrank, November 3 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
• .lawdomain — hhooper, November 3 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
• .law — mandy, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
• .law — kiersten, November 3 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
• .law — MikeC, November 3 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
• Comment on .Law — lil, November 3 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
• .law e-mail initiative — grandpooba, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
• We need this. — roemer, November 3 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw, Inc. — dallasJR3, November 3 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• Real useful idea — bison, November 3 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
• .law — marksamuels, November 3 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
• .Law Domain — MGardberg, November 3 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)
• good idea — jhkinrich, November 3 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
• .law — B.Taylor, November 3 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
• .law = user friendly internet — katempp98, November 3 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
• dot law important idea — donneri, November 3 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
• comments — sfriedman, November 3 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
• Simple, Easier Web Navigation — mvmiller, November 3 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law — h.art.jonasson, November 3 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
• .law — NDW, November 3 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — estradal, November 3 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
• dotlawdomain — RFS, November 3 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dhooker, November 3 @ 4:04 PM (3/3)
• Re: Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)
• Reservations Regarding Application — rasatter, November 5 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)
• Do you know how the current system works? — software_engineer, November 4 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• application of dotLaw — christine, November 3 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
• Smart Start — StarDream, November 3 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
• .law — Amy, November 3 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
• comment.law — Lori J. McGuire, November 3 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
• good concept — steven16, November 3 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — Lobbyist, November 3 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — szlezinger, November 3 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — drosenberg, November 3 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
• .law — zimmermc, November 3 @ 2:52 PM (1/1)
• dotlaw is a great idea — karenyen, November 3 @ 3:50 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law — bfwebster, November 3 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
• the law domain — paria, November 3 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
• DOTLAW — dudey, November 3 @ 2:02 PM (1/1)
• DotLaw Application — wcmeili, November 4 @ 6:54 PM (0/0)
• .law is a great idea — daimonic, November 3 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
• dotLaw = a much needed service — rargyle, November 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
• .law domain — Coralie Matayoshi, November 2 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
• .law — Reggie, November 2 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• good idea — leevogel, November 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — unclebill, November 2 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — furlong, November 2 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
• .law — mbr, November 2 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
• .law e-mail initiative — trepped, November 2 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
• .law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? — JPA, November 2 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
• domain — lawrence, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — corytodd, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
• In Support of DotLaw — iow4f, November 2 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
• Useful tool — swter, November 2 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
• .law — mmcburney, November 2 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
• Dot Law Application — jimzangaro, November 2 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
• RE: Dot Law Application — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
• .law — cumbow, November 2 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
• Needed help — grezl, November 2 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
• .law — riker, November 2 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
• .law — yeats, November 2 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw ICANN application — mfnlaw, November 2 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
• Comments on website — CindiE, November 2 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
• comments on dotlaw proposal — wmakena, November 2 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)
• Extensions of DotLaw — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw proposal — techentin, November 2 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• lawdomain — jpditty, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
• .law — mtobiason, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
• A useful proposal — MaryCheryl, November 2 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — cholise, November 2 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
• Feedback on .law — Deb, November 2 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)
• Further Clarifications About DotLaw, Inc — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — rsmyers, November 2 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
• Dispute resolution — Morrissey, November 2 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
• Re: Dispute resolution — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 7:02 PM (0/0)
• support for the .law concept — dakin-grimm, November 2 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
• .law — MELISSA, November 2 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)
• Dotlaw — jeremyleon, November 2 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
• Dot.Law — FamLaw, November 2 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw — scrane, November 1 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — ddunham, November 1 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — Amy McCurdy, November 1 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
• A Great Idea — mrscott, November 1 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
• comments — aj, November 1 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
• Comment — vanhuysen, November 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw application — tommyg2230, November 1 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
• Comment — vap613, November 1 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
• Great Idea — MDVACH, November 1 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — david quinto, November 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
• .law URL — rhenneke, November 1 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
• Message — jmaz91578, November 1 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
• Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)
• Re: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, November 1 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)
• International View — Gavin, November 1 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
• .law is a great idea — audi3, November 1 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
• Great IDEA!!! — ninaesq, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Vote for dotLaw — Markroth, October 31 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
• Vote for DotLaw — linden, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• Comment — Jim1, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• Very Helpful — kevinfl, October 31 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — gm1, October 31 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw TLD — Segman, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
• Reaction — aterry, October 31 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — nmcs, October 31 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)
• comment — mungar, October 31 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
• Great idea — jpirone, October 31 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
• .law is a good idea — inhousec, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• good idea — madlin, October 31 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
• Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" — yasmine saadat, October 31 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
• Yes to DotLaw — ssinger, October 31 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
• Strong support for .law — comanche, October 31 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
• Definite YES for dotLaw — krasmussen, October 31 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
• Enthusiastic support for dotLaw — Vig Mangasarian, October 31 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
• dotLaw domain name — rcb, October 30 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — rm1, October 30 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
• .law — RM1, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
• .LAW — DFG1, October 30 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)
• lawdomain.net — Hollywood , October 30 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• Domain .law is a Great Idea! — jake, October 30 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw, inc.  a welcome site! — fthompson, October 30 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
• Yes to .law, brilliant  idea — Soussan Saadat, October 30 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
• proposal feedback — mrb, October 30 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)
• REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal — retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)
• The Realities of Regulation — dotLawInc, October 30 @ 3:44 AM (2/4)
• Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:43 AM (1/1)
• RE: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, November 1 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)
• NO to .law — PHXbird, October 30 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)
• Organized & Useful dotLaw — EddieO, November 1 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)
• Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)
• RE: Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — dotLawInc, October 31 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)
• Application of dot law — Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest — anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)
• good concept — Ankim, November 3 @ 6:45 AM (1/1)
• .law — Susie, November 3 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)
• Clarifications for a Concerned Reviewer — dotLawInc, October 26 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)
• Proposal — lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
• comments on the proposal — manch, November 1 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
• Your request for more information — The Founders, October 30 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)
• .law — R Deming, November 3 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy