Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gavin
Date/Time:	Wed, November 1, 2000 at 2:36 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	International View
Message:
As a Director of Australia's largest prepaid legal service, I support a system of verification, such as in DotLaw Inc's proposal. Should new information "seekers" or "providers" not want verification they will not use the proposed dotlaw TLD and are free to maintain the status quo (e.g. dotcom TLD). There will still be a choice. DotLaw's proposal to have a Domain Advisory Board includes the need for accreditation for the international community and I am please to see this addressed in a proposal. In Australia, a verification process has value as it rewards lawyers that have gone through the difficult Australian accreditation requirements. I would use the TDL.

Message Thread:

• .law Application by dotlaw, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)
• Dot Law is a great idea — GrassHMC, November 6 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
• Good Concept — spw, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
• .law great idea — bmw, November 5 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
• .law application by dotlaw, Inc. — SoCalLawyer, November 5 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
• I vote YES for .law !! — DK, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
• The Moldovan Connection — rarmstrong, November 5 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time — gerdan, November 5 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
• .law application — tbing1, November 5 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
• good idea — patk, November 5 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
• Great Idea!! — Law Dude, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
• Pro .law — electrolex, November 5 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
• makes sense — hgmobile, November 5 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
• Much Needed! — rigtyme, November 5 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
• Wonderful idea — golaw, November 5 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
• Marvellous — swiv, November 5 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
• The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! — Larry Rossomondo, November 5 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw is good idea — lawstudent, November 5 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
• Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload — Tamie Leckemby, November 5 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
• Great Idea — jolly, November 5 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
• Dot-law a very good idea! — thalernd, November 4 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
• support for dot-law — johnsonbx, November 4 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw for Law Schools — saama, November 4 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
• Support for DotLaw — charriman, November 4 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)
• Support — allen@pwc, November 4 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
• comments — joematerazo, November 4 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
• .law — g_davis, November 4 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw promotes the public welfare — LloydRandolph, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
• Comments of John F. McClatchey — John F. McClatchey, November 4 @ 4:27 PM (1/1)
• Welcomed Further Input From The Legal Profession! — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
• Comment — Mark J. Pandiscio, November 4 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw Helps International Legal Community — Heli Rostami, November 4 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
• Dot.Law — Jemmil, November 4 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw — sbhans, November 4 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
• well done! — adavis1990, November 4 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
• merits of dotlaw — Ruth, November 3 @ 11:56 PM (1/1)
• Good law — Ruth, November 3 @ 11:57 PM (0/0)
• .law — JAKauerauf, November 3 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law proposal — bmcarson, November 3 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
• tld.law — Hilton, November 3 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — pkalb, November 3 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
• in favor of .law domain — tfb212, November 3 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
• domain — Alexlaw, November 3 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
• in favor of .law domain — lawyer212, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
• .law — wjk, November 3 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• .law — Bert Foer, November 3 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
• support — ptc, November 3 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — NPC122, November 3 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
• dot-law — hgwinnell, November 3 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
• Support for Dot.law — Bradleymcc, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — lgibbes, November 3 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
• The "dotLaw" Registration — MFrank, November 3 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
• .lawdomain — hhooper, November 3 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
• .law — mandy, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
• .law — kiersten, November 3 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
• .law — MikeC, November 3 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
• Comment on .Law — lil, November 3 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
• .law e-mail initiative — grandpooba, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
• We need this. — roemer, November 3 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• DotLaw, Inc. — dallasJR3, November 3 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• Real useful idea — bison, November 3 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
• .law — marksamuels, November 3 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
• .Law Domain — MGardberg, November 3 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)
• good idea — jhkinrich, November 3 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
• .law — B.Taylor, November 3 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
• .law = user friendly internet — katempp98, November 3 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
• dot law important idea — donneri, November 3 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
• comments — sfriedman, November 3 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
• Simple, Easier Web Navigation — mvmiller, November 3 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law — h.art.jonasson, November 3 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
• .law — NDW, November 3 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — estradal, November 3 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
• dotlawdomain — RFS, November 3 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dhooker, November 3 @ 4:04 PM (3/3)
• Re: Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)
• Reservations Regarding Application — rasatter, November 5 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)
• Do you know how the current system works? — software_engineer, November 4 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• application of dotLaw — christine, November 3 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
• Smart Start — StarDream, November 3 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
• .law — Amy, November 3 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
• comment.law — Lori J. McGuire, November 3 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
• good concept — steven16, November 3 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — Lobbyist, November 3 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — szlezinger, November 3 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — drosenberg, November 3 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
• .law — zimmermc, November 3 @ 2:52 PM (1/1)
• dotlaw is a great idea — karenyen, November 3 @ 3:50 PM (0/0)
• Support for .law — bfwebster, November 3 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
• the law domain — paria, November 3 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
• DOTLAW — dudey, November 3 @ 2:02 PM (1/1)
• DotLaw Application — wcmeili, November 4 @ 6:54 PM (0/0)
• .law is a great idea — daimonic, November 3 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
• dotLaw = a much needed service — rargyle, November 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
• .law domain — Coralie Matayoshi, November 2 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
• .law — Reggie, November 2 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• good idea — leevogel, November 2 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — unclebill, November 2 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — furlong, November 2 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
• .law — mbr, November 2 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
• .law e-mail initiative — trepped, November 2 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
• .law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? — JPA, November 2 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
• domain — lawrence, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — corytodd, November 2 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
• In Support of DotLaw — iow4f, November 2 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
• Useful tool — swter, November 2 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
• .law — mmcburney, November 2 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
• Dot Law Application — jimzangaro, November 2 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
• RE: Dot Law Application — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
• .law — cumbow, November 2 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
• Needed help — grezl, November 2 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
• .law — riker, November 2 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
• .law — yeats, November 2 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw ICANN application — mfnlaw, November 2 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
• Comments on website — CindiE, November 2 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
• comments on dotlaw proposal — wmakena, November 2 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)
• Extensions of DotLaw — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw proposal — techentin, November 2 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• lawdomain — jpditty, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
• .law — mtobiason, November 2 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
• A useful proposal — MaryCheryl, November 2 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — cholise, November 2 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
• Feedback on .law — Deb, November 2 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)
• Further Clarifications About DotLaw, Inc — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — rsmyers, November 2 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
• Dispute resolution — Morrissey, November 2 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
• Re: Dispute resolution — dotLawInc, November 5 @ 7:02 PM (0/0)
• support for the .law concept — dakin-grimm, November 2 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
• .law — MELISSA, November 2 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)
• Dotlaw — jeremyleon, November 2 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
• Dot.Law — FamLaw, November 2 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
• dotlaw — scrane, November 1 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw — ddunham, November 1 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — Amy McCurdy, November 1 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
• A Great Idea — mrscott, November 1 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
• comments — aj, November 1 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
• Comment — vanhuysen, November 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw application — tommyg2230, November 1 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
• Comment — vap613, November 1 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
• Great Idea — MDVACH, November 1 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — david quinto, November 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
• .law URL — rhenneke, November 1 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
• Message — jmaz91578, November 1 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
• Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)
• Re: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, November 1 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)
• International View — Gavin, November 1 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
• .law is a great idea — audi3, November 1 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
• Great IDEA!!! — ninaesq, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Vote for dotLaw — Markroth, October 31 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
• Vote for DotLaw — linden, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• Comment — Jim1, October 31 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
• Very Helpful — kevinfl, October 31 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — gm1, October 31 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw TLD — Segman, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
• Reaction — aterry, October 31 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
• dotLaw — nmcs, October 31 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)
• comment — mungar, October 31 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
• Great idea — jpirone, October 31 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
• .law is a good idea — inhousec, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
• good idea — madlin, October 31 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
• Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" — yasmine saadat, October 31 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
• Yes to DotLaw — ssinger, October 31 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
• Strong support for .law — comanche, October 31 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
• Definite YES for dotLaw — krasmussen, October 31 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
• Enthusiastic support for dotLaw — Vig Mangasarian, October 31 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
• dotLaw domain name — rcb, October 30 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
• .law domain — rm1, October 30 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
• .law — RM1, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
• .LAW — DFG1, October 30 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)
• lawdomain.net — Hollywood , October 30 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
• Domain .law is a Great Idea! — jake, October 30 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw, inc.  a welcome site! — fthompson, October 30 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
• Yes to .law, brilliant  idea — Soussan Saadat, October 30 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
• proposal feedback — mrb, October 30 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)
• REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal — retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)
• The Realities of Regulation — dotLawInc, October 30 @ 3:44 AM (2/4)
• Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, November 1 @ 5:43 AM (1/1)
• RE: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, November 1 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)
• NO to .law — PHXbird, October 30 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)
• Organized & Useful dotLaw — EddieO, November 1 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)
• Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)
• RE: Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — dotLawInc, October 31 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)
• Application of dot law — Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
• dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest — anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)
• good concept — Ankim, November 3 @ 6:45 AM (1/1)
• .law — Susie, November 3 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)
• Clarifications for a Concerned Reviewer — dotLawInc, October 26 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)
• Proposal — lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
• comments on the proposal — manch, November 1 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
• Your request for more information — The Founders, October 30 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)
• .law — R Deming, November 3 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy