RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Work-planning

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mmmmhhh...
I thought it wat the other way around, i.e.:
In what circumstances might consumers have advantages if a registry owns (or
in some other way controls) a retail supplier of its names?
In other words, the "default" being vertical separation, in which cases
vertical integration would produce benefit.
R.
 
 
 


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Tindal
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:11
To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Work-planning


Mikey 

Thanks for the hard work.  This sort of process and structure will help get
us there.

As a general observation, I don't think we should be too daunted by the
scope and timeline of the PDP.  At its essence, the question we're asked is
simple:

In what circumstances might consumers be harmed by a registry owning (or in
some other way controlling) a retail supplier of its names?

I dont think it's that difficult a question.  I believe we'll get there
before Brussels

RT


On Mar 27, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:


hi all,

i wanted to share a little document that i've been chipping away at over the
last few days.  i'm *most* appreciative of the dialog on the list and would
like to stimulate a little more before our meeting next Monday.  advance
alert, i have no editorial pride and am actively looking for thoughts.

this deck is mostly about the way that we might approach our work.  i've
laid out a series of approaches, a little analysis of the pros and cons of
each.  of course, picking an approach to the work will also define the scope
and thus the content and impact of the work as well.  so picking an approach
is more than just an exercise in project management.

there have been lots and lots of very helpful posts about this and we've
been reading them closely and discussing the implications amongst the
leadership group.  i'm thinking that this draft is in good enough shape to
put in front of the rest of you for comments/improvements.  

apologies in advance for the slide-deck, bullet-point format.  i know it can
drive people crazy. it's just the tool i use to think about things like
this.  please give this a read and comment back on this thread.  we'll be
reading closely and i will work your thoughts into the next draft for
discussion during the call on Monday.

thanks!

mikey

<VI Project v4.pdf>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109  
fax   866-280-2356  
web www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)