Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
Gregory W. Krajewski |
| Date/Time: |
Mon, October 16, 2000 at 5:17 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
My Last Post.....I am not one to have the last word, but you make me refute your comments--easily |
Message: |
|
A wise man said that you can't
argue with someone who doesn't believe in logic, because they only pick and choose
facts that make a position appear to be correct...For Logic has to be visited on
both sides of an argument....You posted the following (from the link I gave you --which
is below)<<<<"Summary: Selling
items does not risk an organization's tax-exempt status if the revenue generated
is used to promote the organization's exempt function and the applicable taxes are
paid on any unrelated business income.">>>>>>Somehow I get the feeling you get
your news from the comic section of the paper (which is about the reading level your
capable of)... If you would have gone further....You would have also read: "The
first issue for an organization is to determine if it HAS an exempt purpose. If the
answer is in the affirmative, then it is merely a technical issue to determine how
to satisfy the exempt organization/non-profit rules. But if the approach is: let's
get tax exempt by coming up with an exempt purpose, that is an invitation to disaster.----from
the link below) You say that the Articles with with CORE at the following link
is still legitmate??? http://corenic.org/about_core/articles.htm (by
the way the link you gave did not go directly to the articles...you gave the following
link which makes it harder for the consumer to get to ): http://corenic.org/about_core/about.htm
So
BrianC...i am done with this discussion..You prove that 15 years as a businessmen
has given you, a couple of things (registrations from NameBargain...and some premise-less
arguments (I invented premise-less)....
Good luck sir...and to others who read
this...BrianC was asking for it, as his comments were biting towards me for no reason..So
as a fellow businessman, I won't take it lying down...What I hope comes from this
string is that some questions will be raised with respect to CORE's status as a non-profit....that
is it...
|
|
|
| Link: |
Here is the link again...Please read beyond the summary! |
Message Thread:
- .nom Application by CORE Internet Council of Registrars — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:11 PM (15/49)
- Support for the .NOM proposal from CORE — JMB, November 5 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
- Questionable financial & business capabilies — griffiths, November 5 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
- Exellent CORE application for .NOM — kasia, November 4 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
- Few Positive Points in Regards to CORE Application — sharjeel, November 3 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
- Question... — PHXbird, November 3 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Support to CORE .nom proposal — RETEVISION, November 2 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
- CORE application is good for the Internet — ksoussi, November 2 @ 1:07 AM (1/1)
- How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — hunter, October 27 @ 3:47 AM (1/4)
- CORE should be required to accept due process in US — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 5:20 AM (1/1)
- Why is CORE Hiding Its Financials? — Need2Know, October 20 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
- CORE's application for .NOM now online! — nike, October 19 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
- CORE's proposal for .NOM — nike, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
- Why don't CORE stop Pre-registrations for .nom, from it's CO-Founder Knipp.de? — Rebeka, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/4)
- Is CORE Nonprofit or FOR Profit.....Please Respond..Someone from CORE....... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:01 AM (2/24)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy