Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
Conway |
| Date/Time: |
Tue, October 24, 2000 at 2:26 AM GMT (Mon, October 23, 2000 at 6:26 PM PST) |
| Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.73 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
.fam and .xxx |
Message: |
|
What does it matter, it would make it easier for filtering
out the x-rated sites from my children. Magazine and book publishers do all types
of publishing. That doesn't mean that they sell x-rated material to kids.
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)
- Whatever happenned to the dot shops — chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
- ABACUS - Great Concept — ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
- USA families — mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
- yes to FAM — henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
- .fam — andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL — kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
- .cool — kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Family — JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) — tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- Families need .FAM — sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- support for .COOL — tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)
- .COOL great idea — AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)
- This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? — griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- IOD issue — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
- .cool will just be a fad — YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)
- .XXX a poor idea — ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Does Pedro work for Abacus? — YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)
- Abacus got it right — pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .FAM — AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- Why Abacus for .biz — ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- About dot .biz and .inc — dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC.com Pole — domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .COOL — domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Trying to be cool — nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
- cool — jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)
- .fam — mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public — alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- To: saynotoabacus — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
- EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. — vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
- Abacus App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- I like .cool — ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- Different policies for ".biz" portion — Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
- Anyone know who else has it ready to go? — useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)
- .xxx — MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)
- Young people — nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
- I agree with jandl — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)
- Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to — SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
- WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM — Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)
- To saynotoabacus — use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- .biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)
- Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- Way to go Abacus! — use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- We want to see your application — emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- .fam is needed — dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)
- Simply unworkable — jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- .BIZ applications — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)
- Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy