I Agree (.FAM and .XXX)

Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: tw

Date/Time: Sun, November 5, 2000 at 10:36 PM GMT

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0

Score: 5

Subject: I Agree (.FAM and .XXX)

Message:

I agree we, needed .FAM .
ICANN should approve the TLDs that the people want.
Not those that the companies want.
People want .FAM and .XXX . (look at the MSNBC article http://www.msnbc.com/modules/surveys/domainname.asp)

Message Thread:

.biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)

Whatever happenned to the dot shops — chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
ABACUS - Great Concept — ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
USA families — mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
yes to FAM — henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
.fam — andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL — kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
.cool — kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
Family — JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) — tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
Families need .FAM — sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
support for .COOL — tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)

Too limited — PHXbird, November 5 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

.COOL great idea — AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)

Not international enough — PHXbird, November 5 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? — griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
IOD issue — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
.cool will just be a fad — YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)

just a fad ? — tn, November 5 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
Faddish names — twosheds, November 3 @ 5:14 PM (0/0)

.XXX a poor idea — ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
Does Pedro work for Abacus? — YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)

No pressing need for .FAM ??? — JohnD, November 2 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)
Sorry but you are not fully correct — nickl, November 2 @ 7:12 PM (0/0)
Does it matter — pedro, November 1 @ 8:14 PM (1/5)

Ready to go — cambler, November 2 @ 2:18 AM (1/4)

A few words — useyourhead, November 3 @ 11:27 PM (1/3)

Registry for Review — cambler, November 4 @ 3:08 AM (1/2)

There is nothing there — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:27 AM (1/1)

will review — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:29 AM (0/0)

Abacus got it right — pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
Yes to .FAM — AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
Why Abacus for .biz — ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
About dot .biz and .inc — dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
MSNBC.com Pole — domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
.COOL — domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
Trying to be cool — nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
cool — jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)

.FAM is the way to go — domainking, October 27 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

.fam — mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public — alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
To: saynotoabacus — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. — vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
Abacus App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
I like .cool — ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
Different policies for ".biz" portion — Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

ICANN decides not a competitor — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

Anyone know who else has it ready to go? — useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)

IOD has been online for over 4 years — cambler, October 23 @ 6:51 AM (3/8)

Image Online Design — Wisdom21, October 31 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
The technology by Abacus — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)
registry since 1996? — anonymous, October 24 @ 6:31 AM (2/5)

Refer to the updates ICANN just posted on their web site — wiredz, October 25 @ 10:56 AM (1/1)

This shows that IOD can't use .web as a trademark but does not deny IOD's rights on .web . — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Our support — cambler, October 24 @ 7:50 AM (1/2)

Mr Ambler used the word 'advised' — wiredz, October 25 @ 12:17 AM (1/1)

Response — cambler, October 25 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)

.xxx — MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)

.Sex TLD — Satori, October 25 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
a voluntary association: ".kids" is ok, but a mandatory ".xxx" is not. — markusbaccus, October 24 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)

Young people — nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
I agree with jandl — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)

This is negotiable — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
I disagree — pedro, October 23 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to — SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

Strong words — PHXbird, October 21 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)

WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM — Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)

I like Names4ever.com — Monya, October 24 @ 3:52 PM (0/0)
Names4ever are excellent. They are one of the BEST — fabiolg, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)

To saynotoabacus — use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)

bz cannot be the business domain — b. adams, October 23 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)

Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
Way to go Abacus! — use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)

Sounds like you work for Abacus (or were paid to send that message)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (3/3)

where did all the good names go? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
Abacus offers superior one on one customer service. — stevexplor, October 20 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)
Hey, enought with the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — For The People, October 20 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)

Abacus buying support? — PHXbird, October 17 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

We want to see your application — emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
.fam is needed — dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)

.fam provided by .xxx -- Bad Idea. — bennionjd, October 16 @ 10:52 PM (4/9)

.fam and .xxx — Conway, October 24 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)
FAM is needed, but requests high responsability — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:17 AM (2/2)

Abacus is fit to operate .fam — pedro, October 23 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)
Sorry - Misspelling "Our Website" — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

your logic is flawed — dconder, October 19 @ 12:33 AM (0/0)
Bad idea is posting opinion without reading the application — pedro, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (1/3)

I've done my reading — bennionjd, October 20 @ 5:43 AM (1/2)

There are no other applicants — dconder, October 23 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)

Not a now-or-never. — bennionjd, October 24 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)

Simply unworkable — jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
.BIZ applications — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)

missing the point — jandl, October 16 @ 12:13 AM (1/2)

i did not know that — b. adams, October 24 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

re: I did not know that — jandl, October 29 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

Strongly disagree — pedro, October 15 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy