This Comment Forum is now closed.
ICANN Public Comment Forum
Tentative Agreements among ICANN, the US Dept of Commerce, and Network Solutions
Comments through 24 November 1999
Privacy: WHOIS database
A member of the Public
, November 24 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
Business Lic Data Base Tie-In?
Michael Scott McGinn
, November 6 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)
CORRECTED COPY - AT&T COMMENTS-DOC-ICANN-NSI
Marilyn S. Cade
, November 3 @ 5:29 PM (1/1)
Agree with comments
Joseph
, November 5 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
Comments on ICANN - NSI Agreement
Andrew Lutts
, November 3 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)
Comments of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation
Jean Cantrell
, November 1 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)
Tentative Agreement and constitutional perspective
Solveig Singleton
, November 1 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)
AIRA Response to Proposals
William H. Bode
, October 30 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)
Off the Wall
hmmmm
, October 30 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)
MCI WorldCom Comments on Tentative Agreements
Susan Anthony
, October 29 @ 11:40 PM (1/1)
Apply MCI's Positions Back on MCI
Equity
, October 30 @ 12:47 AM (0/0)
commerce on the internet will benefit
Jason Welter
, October 29 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)
ICANN/NSI/DOC agreement
Steve Chao
, October 29 @ 10:27 PM (0/0)
support
Rus Fellows, Softlink
, October 29 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)
this is a good agreement
josh foss
, October 29 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
I definitely support the agreement
Steve Davis
, October 29 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
agreement will stablize process
Frederick Otto
, October 29 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
agreement is great
Kevin Rose
, October 29 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)
e-commerce will benefit from agreement
Joe Buell
, October 29 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
I like what this agreement does
Randall Ponder
, October 29 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
agreement makes clear who has responsibility
Frank Shuman
, October 29 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
Agreement
Mitchell Nguyen
, October 29 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
I am very glad this agreement was successful
Kevin Kohn
, October 29 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)
competition is always a good thing
Robert Michael
, October 29 @ 9:12 PM (0/0)
Comment of the FTC staff on the Tentative Agreements
FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection staff
, October 29 @ 9:11 PM (1/1)
This has nothing to do with the agreements
anonymous
, October 30 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)
I Support the Agreement
Kevin Anderson
, October 29 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)
Comment on ICANN/DOC/NSI agreement
John Havis, SDM Corporation
, October 29 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)
this is good for the industry
David Perkins
, October 29 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
agree
Thomas King
, October 29 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)
agreement will get more people on internet
Brian Foster
, October 29 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
Support
Michael Chamberlin
, October 29 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
HAVING AN OPTION WILL BE GOOD
TOM CONLEY
, October 29 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
great idea
Wes Tilthman
, October 29 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
agreement allows competition to proceed
Doug Ingebreten
, October 29 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)
strongly supportive of agreement
Valerio St. Louis
, October 29 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
this agreement pleases me
Brad Bradshaw
, October 29 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)
Bell Atlantic Corporation Comments on the Tentative Agreements Among ICANN, DOC and NSI
Haywood Torrence, Jr.
, October 29 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
agreement is much needed
Tony Zagotta
, October 29 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)
Agreement...
Jim Scott
, October 29 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)
This is Good
Frank Daniels
, October 29 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
AIPLA Comments on DOC, ICANN & NSI Agreements
Michael K. Kirk
, October 29 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
Re-submission of comments (have yet to appear)
Wayne Crews
, October 29 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
Dispute Resolution rules
John E. Halamka, Patent Attorney
, October 29 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
Two objections
Corrin
, October 28 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)
CCDN Comments on DOC/NSI/ICANN Proposed Agreements
Copyright Coalition on Domain Names
, October 28 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
The Need for a Centralized Whois Database
United States Olympic Committee
, October 28 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
good agreement
jon
, October 28 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)
Agreement will Benefit E-Commerce
Steve Olsen
, October 28 @ 7:54 PM (0/0)
this agreement is good for growth of the internet
Christopher Holt
, October 28 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
AT&T Comments-DOC-ICANN-NSI
Marilyn S. Cade
, October 28 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)
I support the agreement
Mary Kross
, October 28 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)
Agreement will bring savings to consumers
Fred srock
, October 28 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
INTA Response to Agreements
Michael Heltzer
, October 28 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
How about making these agreements interim?
Stephen Satchell
, October 28 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)
lower rates are very attractive
Gena Peters
, October 28 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
I support the agreement
Robert Elston
, October 27 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)
Agreement
Joyce Gordon
, October 27 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)
Board Should Approve Agreements
Jeffrey A. Eisenach, Progress Freedom Foundation
, October 27 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
This agreement is great news
Maurice Robberson
, October 27 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
I support the agreement
Paul Hayden
, October 27 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
White paper and proposed agreements
Jean-François Lavignon
, October 27 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)
Agreement is good for everyone
Jared Bronson
, October 27 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
Support Agreement
Robert Duncan
, October 27 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
My Comments
Jean-Michel Bécar
, October 27 @ 9:13 AM (0/0)
Concerns regarding the proposed agreements with DOC and NSI
pm920
, October 27 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)
Re NSI / DOC/ ICANN Agreement
Clive Flory
, October 26 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)
Comments from Council of Citizens Against Government Waste
Tom Schatz
, October 26 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
Analysis by Berkman Center Affiliates
Edelman
, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
Will NSI run .com, .net, .org registry for ever ?
Jean-François Lavignon
, October 25 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
Extremely broad powers in clause 7.i of the Registry Agreement are BAD
the custodian
, October 25 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
4 issues
Michael Froomkin
, October 25 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)
There is a clear move by ICANN to crush the small Domain Owner
sam
, October 25 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
Tucows.com Inc Expresses Concerns about Agreements
Timothy Denton
, October 25 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)
Tucows Competing as OpenSRS
Full Disclosure
, October 28 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)
Accountability of NSI
Jean-François Lavignon
, October 23 @ 5:48 PM (0/0)
Everybody must spread the word about this commentary opportunity
Clinton Gallagher
, October 23 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)
New rights for NSI ?
Jean_François Lavignon
, October 22 @ 3:47 PM (1/1)
No new rights
A.M.Rutkowski
, October 22 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)
Letter to ICANN and the US Dept of Commerce
Desiree Miloshevic
, October 22 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
A Consumers Question
Jennifer S. Johnson
, October 22 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
CORRECTION: A New World Order - corrected URL
Judith Oppenheimer
, October 21 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
A New World Order
Judith Oppenheimer
, October 21 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
Domain Name Seizure Clauses, e.g. Clause J.7.i.
John Metz
, October 21 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
Comments regarding the recent ICANN/NSI agreements and Congressional oversight
Grover G. Norquist
, October 21 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
Comments on ICANN, NSI and US DoC Agreements
registrars
, October 20 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
Network Solutions/ Internic / Network Regulations Control
EvilDog666
, October 19 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
Domain Name Security
Peter Aven
, October 19 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)
EXAMPLE OF THEIR GREAT SERVICE
greg
, October 19 @ 2:36 PM (1/3)
so?
postmaster
, October 19 @ 3:21 PM (1/2)
Yeah, but they show a pattern
The Turtle
, October 23 @ 5:36 AM (1/1)
Yep, that's why I suggested ICANN add a performance clause
Stephen Satchell
, October 23 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)
InterNIC
chick
, October 19 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)
NETWORK SOLUTIONS
greg
, October 19 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
NSI's POWERFUL LOBBY WINS AGAIN
Angelo Gonzalez
, October 18 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)
Issues of misuse of registrant data
The Turtle
, October 16 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)
Hey, SEND COMPLAINTS TO AL GORE...
Jeff
, October 15 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)
BAD BAD Customer Service from NSI
Jeff M
, October 15 @ 7:00 PM (1/1)
Networthless Solutions: Is anybody out there?
Mark K
, October 20 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
Maintenance of NSI Monopoly on Renewals of Current Registrations
Gary L. Reback
, October 15 @ 1:41 AM (1/1)
Customers on a Platter?
Postmaster
, October 27 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
Comments on Agreements Among ICANN, USDOC, NSI
Small Business Survival Committee
, October 14 @ 1:12 PM (0/0)
POOR (NO) Service
Nathan J
, October 13 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
NSI server down - phones busy
Barry N. Sher
, October 13 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
NSI performance requirement, monitoring
Stephen Satchell
, October 12 @ 6:07 PM (3/3)
Add a privacy policy, and I'll buy it
The Turtle
, October 16 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)
Where are the SRS Specifications?
Junius
, October 15 @ 7:50 AM (0/0)
Excellent Proposed Additions
Doug
, October 14 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
Proposed change to Zone File Access Agreement
Stephen Satchell
, October 12 @ 8:43 AM (0/0)
Test message
Test
, October 11 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)
The Facist Zone File Access Agreement
Clinton Gallagher
, October 9 @ 3:48 PM (2/3)
Not a rumor, but could be much more than $10K
Junius
, October 11 @ 7:52 PM (1/1)
Facism can be thwarted
Clinton Gallagher
, October 23 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
how much power do we have to stop this?
frustrated
, October 9 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
$10,000 registrar license fee to NSI??
Martin
, October 9 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)
Registrar agreement termination restriction
Stephen Satchell
, October 8 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)
Need to add hold-harmless clause to agreements
Stephen Satchell
, October 8 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
Let's refer to the protocol by the offical name, please
Stephen Satchell
, October 7 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
Information provision requirement
Stephen Satchell
, October 7 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Registry agreement -- remove empty Appendix A
Stephen Satchell
, October 7 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
Registration Blues
Tony
, October 6 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
Mr. Government, LEAVE US ALONE!!!
Swamp Rat
, October 6 @ 7:30 AM (0/0)
Modify the Registrar Agreement
Dennis Schaefer
, October 6 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
Business Dealings, Including with SLD Holders
Bruce M. Binder
, October 5 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
ICANN Domain Name Seizure Policy
Judith Oppenheimer
, October 5 @ 10:55 PM (0/0)
PUBLICALLY TRADED, SELF PROMOTING, FOR PROFIT, MONOPOLY
barbara
, October 5 @ 3:25 PM (2/2)
very true.Time for NSI to loosen the grip on our necks!
frustrated
, October 9 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)
Amen sister!
bunco
, October 5 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
Is 6$ per registration and an 8 year monopoly excessive?
Elliott
, October 5 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)
NSI must be stopped!
Ken Schiff
, October 5 @ 5:12 AM (1/1)
No, leave 'em in, but...
The Turtle
, October 16 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)
NSI's staggeringly poor service
Erik Schmidt
, October 4 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
Recommendation to Approve DOC-ICANN-NSI Agreement
Joseph Friedman
, October 4 @ 3:10 PM (1/3)
Have you actually dealt with NSI?
Grace M. Esquivel
, October 7 @ 5:10 PM (1/2)
Ensure NSI provides reasonable customer service
Doug
, October 14 @ 11:02 PM (1/1)
...and protect registrant privacy!
The Turtle
, October 16 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)
Questions to be addressed before any papers are signed
Eric Favreau
, October 4 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
Peace in our time
Junius
, October 4 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
"You agree that we may delete or transfer your domain name at any time."
Judith Oppenheimer
, October 4 @ 4:20 AM (0/0)
NSI rules the world again
Wayne
, October 4 @ 2:13 AM (0/0)
Welcome!
Andrew McLaughlin
, October 3 @ 11:45 PM (1/1)
NSI's POWERFUL LOBBY WINS AGAIN
Angelo
, October 17 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
0 Fresh + 0 New + 142 Old = 142 Total headers
Privacy Policy
|
Terms of Service
|
Cookies Policy