<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
- To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:53:14 +0100
On 2 Dec 2009, at 14:27, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Avri,
>
> If I understand you correctly, your conclusion is not correct. FCFS will
> only apply (for LDH or IDN) if the exact second-level domain is not already
> registered as a second-level domain name in the applicable TLD (LDH or IDN).
On 2 Dec 2009, at 15:14, Edmon Chung wrote:
> Edmon: I think Avri you probably mistook the idea... I think what Chuck and
> I were talking about is NOT about translation at the second level. But
> offering the same string to the same registrant under an IDN TLD. More
> specifically, for example, a registrant of "computer.asia" will be offered
> "computer.???" (where "???" is "Asia" in Japanese), OR a registrant for
> "???????.asia" (where "???????" means "Internet" in Japanese) will be
> offered "???????.???". There is no translation involved.
>
>>
Pardon me, but i remain confused:
concrete example/question
(ps we beter develop a way of talking about this that is not confusing. if we
who supposedl understand at least somewhat of what is going on can't
communicate, opps, we have trouble.)
I have ella.com and i might like to have it in Hebrew.
would i get ella.Hebrew_TLD-of-dotcom
or would i have אלה.com
or is that אללה.com
or maybe even אלילה.com
(viable transliterations ad translations)
If we are talking about a translation or transliteration then I remian confused
as to how one does it. If you talking about just giving me the LDH with a
IDN-tld, ok, i understand.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|