Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Pistoff |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 18, 2000 at 6:43 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community |
Message: |
|
I would like to elaborate further regarding my previous posting shown above in the
general section. Sorry for the format, but I felt that applying the case study
method made the most sense. It's an effective way of communicating both the
issues and solutions. Thanks! To ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Central
Issue: The decision making process has not been sufficiently announced to the
outside world. Such inaction is especially troublesome given the fact that
it's taking place during a time when the media's attention is being stretched thin
by several other important events. ICANN needs to compete more effectively
for media coverage.Recommended Course of Action: Extend the decision making
process beyond the U.S. Presidential Elections by a few weeks. Extending the
decision making process would provide a more equitable platform for the following
reasons: 1)many more individuals will have an opportunity to participate; and 2)
the applicants will be treated more equitably since some of their postings were delayed
(for whatever reason) thereby allowing all applicants to enjoy the same amount of
coverage time. ICANN can also print ads in the press and run announcements
on the radio, both very effective mediums in reaching out to the public. Such
announcements can be done quickly and affordably. As for cost, ICANN pulled
in about $2.35 million (47 applicants x $50k). I think the organization can
afford this undertaking given what's at stake. Conclusion: We've waited over
four years to reach this point. What's a few more weeks given the amount of
money, time, and effort that has been invested thus far on expanding the infrastructure
of the internet. Significant Factors (not all inclusive): 1) Many individuals
are posting messages of an emotional nature. This is being done, in part, because
there is limited time in which to debate the complex issues. This, in turn,
has led to a sense of desparation for those involved thus far. 2) The U.S. Presidential
Election and the middle east crises (both obviously very important issues) have absorbed
a significant portion of the media's attention from this very important issue.
3) The World Series is upon us, and as such, it will absorb an additional amount
of media coverage, especially since the games will be held in New York (good for
New York). 4) Several other good reasons which I've neglected to include in the
interest of time (but please feel free to add any points that I've missed if you
so desire). Thank you for taking the time to hear me out.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) Moderator, October 7 @ 10:01 PM (107/118)
- Support for .union fnpsf-cgt, December 22 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
- .union TLD Dan Yager, November 5 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot union HRHL, November 5 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)
- Support message kristina, November 4 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
- setting up a union top level domain on the internet twu, November 3 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union Manon Ress, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union AFA07, November 3 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
- Yes, do it! meretz, November 3 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
- .union proposal Daly, November 2 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union LCJapan, November 2 @ 7:48 AM (0/0)
- Support tor .union Bernie Corbett, November 1 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
- we support the trade union proposal miquel, November 1 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- suport for .union terje, October 31 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
- IPMS supports dot union Lynn Stephenson, October 31 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union IFBWW, October 31 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)
- support for union Freek, October 31 @ 6:38 AM (0/0)
- .union ipaterson, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
- Suport for .union ovemh, October 30 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
- support for .union LO-N, October 30 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)
- union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) stgunnes, October 30 @ 10:07 AM (0/0)
- support for .union Helga Svendsen, October 30 @ 5:23 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot union Magne, October 28 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
- .union proposal Art, October 28 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)
- Pride At Work Supports .union Kkualii, October 28 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- Support for .union Richard_S, October 27 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union violetlight, October 27 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
- Support .union lescault, October 27 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
- ICANN Niki, October 27 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- Domain union budreaua, October 27 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
- SUPPORT FOR UNION DOMAIN NAME arqitekt, October 27 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- support for the ICFTU proposal re tld ".union" peter murphy, October 27 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
- Support for .union lobo, October 26 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)
- dot union julie bignell, October 26 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
- Approve ".union" Internet extension Timothy Engels, October 25 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
- Support for ".union" gilbert, October 25 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- Support of dot union proposal Espen, October 25 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)
- .union jceille, October 24 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot.union sabocat, October 24 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
- whole hearted support of .union csnead, October 24 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot union mayafan, October 24 @ 1:05 PM (1/1)
- Support for dot.union Connect, October 24 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
- We support the trade union proposal! nomet, October 24 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)
- support esr4, October 24 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)
- Support for .Union JRussell, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union kwru, October 23 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot union Perry, October 23 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
- No on .union redbeard, October 23 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union rmberkowitz, October 23 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
- I strongly support .union xernaut, October 23 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot .union MichaelL, October 23 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
- whole hearted support winnie9898, October 23 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
- big buisness bingo, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
- dot union-application by ICFTU SPchig, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
- I support noncommercial .union domain Therese Quinn, October 23 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)
- YES ceberr, October 23 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- Dot.Union - YES cykonno, October 23 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
- .UNION rfretel, October 23 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)
- support .union mpolson, October 22 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot union Brad, October 22 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
- ICFTU application for dotunion TLDs jasondotcom, October 22 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
- UnionTLD angie, October 22 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
- dot union richard55, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- connect the dots mbj, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
- Supporting the dot union/syndicat Segol, October 21 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
- I support the proposal .union on Internet orichet, October 21 @ 1:57 PM (2/2)
- Yes - dot union salmela, October 21 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot .syndicat LeGrand, October 20 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot union alevin, October 20 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
- I support .union kilmer, October 20 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)
- We support the trade union proposal Jose Marcos-Sanchez, October 20 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union Olyves, October 20 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
- YES for new TLD dot union BETOR, October 20 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union TLD usdaw, October 20 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
- OK Go on ARIANA, October 20 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot union FrancoisM, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)
- Support for dot union henri, October 20 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot.union Vadim Borisov, October 20 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot.union leppik, October 20 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
- Not a good idea Richard Flint, October 19 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)
- Support for .union werhane, October 19 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
- Support for ".union" lmfernandez, October 19 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)
- union tld tutaref, October 19 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
- COSATU supports ICFTU's .union TLD proposal Charley Lewis (COSATU), October 19 @ 9:15 AM (0/0)
- I support .union domain name edlfler, October 19 @ 4:45 AM (0/0)
- tld.union arun, October 19 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
- support for .union pgrugan, October 18 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
- support for dot union domain from the UK's TUC nigel stanley, October 18 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- support for .union noe420, October 18 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
- support .union iufmos, October 18 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)
- support for .union Lika Galkina, October 18 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot.union CTUC, October 18 @ 9:34 AM (0/0)
- I support .union migrantworker, October 18 @ 9:09 AM (1/1)
- .union is universally appropriate GeneHaldeman, October 18 @ 2:38 AM (0/0)
- NUGFW supports dot union NUGFW, October 17 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)
- support for .union Peter_Cole, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
- More support for dot union labrlwyr, October 17 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
- The DGC supports the .union TLD application DGC, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
- support for .union davidc, October 17 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- Support for dot.union Seth Wigderson, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
- .union tld co-rowan, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
- Support for .union JLDENV, October 17 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
- support for .union mo'sullivan, October 17 @ 5:34 AM (1/1)
- Support for dot.union asubrigid, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- Support for dot union ccaruso, October 17 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
- Support for .union UNI, October 16 @ 1:58 PM (1/1)
- Support for dot union neila, October 16 @ 1:02 PM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy