Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	LO-N
Date/Time:	Mon, October 30, 2000 at 11:25 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	support for .union
Message:
The Norwegian Confederation of Trade unions (LO-Norway) which represents more than 800 000 members with 26 affiliated unions is supporting the proposal from the ICFTU for the setting up of a ".union" top-level domain" on the Internet, to be managed by trade unions, for trade unions. * there is a clear need for the new domain. Unions are clearly distinct organisations and exist throughout the world. The union movement has a clear infrastructure and is able to effectively administer a new domain. * the internet already plays an important role in the work of unions and is increasing on a daily basis. * unions are a part of the civil society, and the granting of a top-level domain to unions would demonstrate clearly that ICANN wishes the net to serve citizens as well as commercial organisations. Ellen Stensrud Chief information officer
Link:	LO Norway

Message Thread:

• .union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:01 PM (107/118)
• Support for .union — fnpsf-cgt, December 22 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
• .union TLD — Dan Yager, November 5 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — HRHL, November 5 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)
• Support message — kristina, November 4 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
• setting up a union top level domain on the internet — twu, November 3 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Manon Ress, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — AFA07, November 3 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
• Yes, do it! — meretz, November 3 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
• .union proposal — Daly, November 2 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — LCJapan, November 2 @ 7:48 AM (0/0)
• Support tor .union — Bernie Corbett, November 1 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
• we support the trade union proposal — miquel, November 1 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
• suport for .union — terje, October 31 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
• IPMS supports dot union — Lynn Stephenson, October 31 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — IFBWW, October 31 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)
• support for union — Freek, October 31 @ 6:38 AM (0/0)
• .union — ipaterson, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
• Suport for .union — ovemh, October 30 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — LO-N, October 30 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)
• union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — stgunnes, October 30 @ 10:07 AM (0/0)
• support for .union — Helga Svendsen, October 30 @ 5:23 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Magne, October 28 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
• .union proposal — Art, October 28 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)
• Pride At Work Supports .union — Kkualii, October 28 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Richard_S, October 27 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
• Support .union — lescault, October 27 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
• ICANN — Niki, October 27 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
• Domain union — budreaua, October 27 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
• SUPPORT FOR UNION DOMAIN NAME — arqitekt, October 27 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
• support for the ICFTU proposal re tld ".union" — peter murphy, October 27 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — lobo, October 26 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)
• dot union — julie bignell, October 26 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
• Approve ".union" Internet extension — Timothy Engels, October 25 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
• Support for ".union" — gilbert, October 25 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
• Support of dot union proposal — Espen, October 25 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)
• .union — jceille, October 24 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — sabocat, October 24 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
• whole hearted support of .union — csnead, October 24 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — mayafan, October 24 @ 1:05 PM (1/1)
• Support for .union — abible, October 24 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Connect, October 24 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• We support the trade union proposal! — nomet, October 24 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)
• support — esr4, October 24 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)
• Support for .Union — JRussell, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — kwru, October 23 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Perry, October 23 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
• No on .union — redbeard, October 23 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — rmberkowitz, October 23 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
• I strongly support .union — xernaut, October 23 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot .union — MichaelL, October 23 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
• whole hearted support — winnie9898, October 23 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
• big buisness — bingo, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
• dot union-application by ICFTU — SPchig, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
• I support noncommercial .union domain — Therese Quinn, October 23 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)
• YES — ceberr, October 23 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
• Dot.Union - YES — cykonno, October 23 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
• .UNION — rfretel, October 23 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)
• support .union — mpolson, October 22 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Brad, October 22 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
• ICFTU application for dotunion TLDs — jasondotcom, October 22 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
• UnionTLD — angie, October 22 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
• dot union — richard55, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
• connect the dots — mbj, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
• Supporting the dot union/syndicat — Segol, October 21 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
• I support the proposal .union on Internet — orichet, October 21 @ 1:57 PM (2/2)
• Support for union.com — Brad , October 22 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)
• WHY YOU SHOULD OPPOSE THIS — Richard Flint, October 21 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
• Yes - dot union — salmela, October 21 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot .syndicat — LeGrand, October 20 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — alevin, October 20 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
• I support .union — kilmer, October 20 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)
• Support for .union — warmanns, October 20 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)
• We support the trade union proposal — Jose Marcos-Sanchez, October 20 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Olyves, October 20 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
• YES for new TLD dot union — BETOR, October 20 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union TLD — usdaw, October 20 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
• OK Go on — ARIANA, October 20 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — FrancoisM, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)
• support for .union — rachel, October 20 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — henri, October 20 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Vadim Borisov, October 20 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — leppik, October 20 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
• Not a good idea — Richard Flint, October 19 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)
• Response — pruett, October 20 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — werhane, October 19 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
• Support for ".union" — lmfernandez, October 19 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)
• union tld — tutaref, October 19 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
• COSATU supports ICFTU's .union TLD proposal — Charley Lewis (COSATU), October 19 @ 9:15 AM (0/0)
• I support .union domain name — edlfler, October 19 @ 4:45 AM (0/0)
• tld.union — arun, October 19 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — pgrugan, October 18 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
• support for dot union domain from the UK's TUC — nigel stanley, October 18 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — noe420, October 18 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
• support .union — iufmos, October 18 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)
• support for .union — Lika Galkina, October 18 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — CTUC, October 18 @ 9:34 AM (0/0)
• I support .union — migrantworker, October 18 @ 9:09 AM (1/1)
• .union for unions — jcleeland, October 19 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)
• .union is universally appropriate — GeneHaldeman, October 18 @ 2:38 AM (0/0)
• NUGFW supports dot union — NUGFW, October 17 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — Peter_Cole, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• More support for dot union — labrlwyr, October 17 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
• The DGC supports the .union TLD application — DGC, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — davidc, October 17 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Seth Wigderson, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
• .union tld — co-rowan, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — JLDENV, October 17 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — mo'sullivan, October 17 @ 5:34 AM (1/1)
• support for .union — snichol, October 17 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — asubrigid, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — ccaruso, October 17 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — UNI, October 16 @ 1:58 PM (1/1)
• .union application hast support from FES — schweise, October 26 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — neila, October 16 @ 1:02 PM (1/2)
• support zee dot.syndicat — sapacontinent, October 17 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)
• support for dot union — bojon, October 28 @ 7:54 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy