Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	cambler
Date/Time:	Wed, October 18, 2000 at 7:41 PM GMT (Wed, October 18, 2000 at 12:41 AM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Inaccuracies
Message:
For the record, the above post is full of factual inaccuracies, not the least of which (but certainly not the only) being that Image Online Design has no experience (the company has almost 5 years of direct operational experience), and that Image Online Design wants 5 years of exclusive operation (just plainly wrong, as the company intends to accept ICANN registrars as quickly as possible, and is open to the possibility of being able to do it immediately). The rest of the points have been discussed elsewhere. Apologies for posting in JVTeam's forum, but these inaccuracies needed correction. Christopher Ambler CTO, Image Online Design, Inc. The .Web Internet Domain Registry

Message Thread:

• .dot, etc. Application by Neustar, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:26 PM (23/49)
• ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:03 AM (0/0)
• Neustar Shoots Self In Foot ... Must Be Disqualified — dcorish, November 4 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
• Neustar/MelbourneIT is Either Lying or the Application is Flawed! — jtrade, November 2 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)
• What's That Foul Smell? — jtrade, November 1 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)
• .Web,MelbourneIT/Neustar,ICANN Director Greg Crew and Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, November 1 @ 2:19 AM (0/0)
• ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world! — fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
• Neustar's application should be accepted - IOD have no legal rights — Alex Williamson, October 26 @ 11:25 PM (3/9)
• Are you sure? You should be careful with your reckless arguments — fabrcop, October 30 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)
• You didn't explain why Neustar should be accepted...and for what domains? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27 @ 4:33 AM (0/0)
• What breach of copyright? — cambler, October 26 @ 11:34 PM (1/6)
• A bit about Prior Use — wiredz, October 30 @ 9:34 AM (5/5)
• Apologize, please — cambler, October 31 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)
• WiredZ...why didn't you say you were from openSRS — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)
• Your Credibility, Persuasion & Logic:  All Flawed — PHXbird, October 30 @ 9:54 PM (0/0)
• Remember, "wiredz" = Racist To Muslims — pilot2, October 30 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)
• You're obsessed. — World Thoughts, October 30 @ 10:20 AM (0/0)
• Neustar app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)
• How fast can Warberg-Pincus, Lockheed Martin & MelbourneIT Turn .WEB into Big $$$ — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
• MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:51 AM (1/2)
• msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:48 PM (1/1)
• NeuStar paid for his opinion — cambler, October 26 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
• Where's the Competition — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
• THIS is 1 of the few DECENT PROPOSALS — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)
• ICANN Bribery — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)
• Bribery? No: they know that IOD deserves of .web — fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
• This is EXACTLY how a monopoly operates...Massive Media ...Get your Econ 101 book out... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)
• I disagree: the Internet needs .web and other TLDs IMMEDIATELY — fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)
• Neustar,Afilias Bid to Steal .Web — jtrade, October 18 @ 1:49 AM (1/5)
• Accept NeuStar's Application! — wiredz, October 18 @ 12:20 AM (2/4)
• Inaccuracies — cambler, October 18 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)
• IOD's monopoly??! This is curious! — fabrcop, October 18 @ 1:45 PM (1/2)
• Read my previous post carefully — wiredz, October 18 @ 3:17 PM (1/1)
• Sharing — cambler, October 18 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
• .web concerns — David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
• IOD Hypocracy — jjnlaw72, October 17 @ 3:03 PM (5/5)
• Dont be so sure — sinbad, October 31 @ 9:34 AM (0/0)
• Here is what IOD will do with registrant's who registered AOL.WEB — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)
• Court Case — jjnlaw72, October 17 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
• Court cases? — PHXbird, October 17 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
• HYPOCRISY,  NOT "HYPOCRACY"... And You Are Wrong — pilot, October 17 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
• Neustar Application Also Involves CORE For .WEB, TRYING TO BRIBE ICANN! — pilot, October 17 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)
• Ethical Suicide — Merlin, October 17 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)
• Bribery, indeed — For The People, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (1/1)
• I concur. Bribery. — larreeee, October 17 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
• Are you attempting to BRIBE ICANN? — jtrade, October 17 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
• Neustar and it's DOT WEB application — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:46 AM (1/2)
• No To This Application. — Merlin, October 17 @ 5:38 AM (1/1)
• Yes, to NeuStar's Application for .WEB — wiredz, October 25 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy