Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Alex Williamson |
Date/Time: |
Thu, October 26, 2000 at 11:25 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Neustar's application should be accepted - IOD have no legal rights |
Message: |
|
Dear ICANN committee members,Firstly
I would like to say that there is without doubt leeway created by the fact that there
are multiple parties applying to register the same Top Level Domain(s). This in turn
leads to the ability to reject individual applications but still create the TLD,
I think this should be kept firmly in mind while considering the application of IOD
to become the .WEB registrars. IOD have no legal right to the .WEB registry, as
was proved in the Case IOD vs. CORE as far as I know that case sets a legal precedent
– that IOD have no legal claim on the .WEB registry. This is a firm that has knowingly
accepted registrations in breech of International and US copyright laws as well as
taking users’ monies without providing any service to speak of, in addition they
also refuse to refund fees paid despite lack of service provision. If IOD’s claim
is accepted I know for a fact that there will be a breach of our UK copyright the
moment that the TLDs go live. We (amongst many others) will file for breach of copyright
a 9am the day IOD’s services become active. This will lead to massive legal costs
for ICANN, as well as IOD, whether the company can continue trading under the intense
legal pressure they will come under is another question altogether. If ICANN wish
to maintain their integrity and their reputation for upholding the rights of copyright
holders they must reject IOD’s claim to the .WEB registry. Regards, Alex Williamson icann@q-web.co.uk
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .dot, etc. Application by Neustar, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:26 PM (23/49)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:03 AM (0/0)
- Neustar Shoots Self In Foot ... Must Be Disqualified dcorish, November 4 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- Neustar/MelbourneIT is Either Lying or the Application is Flawed! jtrade, November 2 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)
- What's That Foul Smell? jtrade, November 1 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)
- .Web,MelbourneIT/Neustar,ICANN Director Greg Crew and Conflict of Interest? jtrade, November 1 @ 2:19 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world! fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
- Neustar's application should be accepted - IOD have no legal rights Alex Williamson, October 26 @ 11:25 PM (3/9)
- Neustar app peniel, October 25 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)
- How fast can Warberg-Pincus, Lockheed Martin & MelbourneIT Turn .WEB into Big $$$ TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:51 AM (1/2)
- Where's the Competition jtrade, October 24 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
- THIS is 1 of the few DECENT PROPOSALS stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)
- Bribery? No: they know that IOD deserves of .web fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
- This is EXACTLY how a monopoly operates...Massive Media ...Get your Econ 101 book out... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)
- Neustar,Afilias Bid to Steal .Web jtrade, October 18 @ 1:49 AM (1/5)
- .web concerns David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- IOD Hypocracy jjnlaw72, October 17 @ 3:03 PM (5/5)
- Neustar Application Also Involves CORE For .WEB, TRYING TO BRIBE ICANN! pilot, October 17 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)
- Ethical Suicide Merlin, October 17 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)
- Bribery, indeed For The People, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (1/1)
- Are you attempting to BRIBE ICANN? jtrade, October 17 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
- Neustar and it's DOT WEB application Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:46 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy