Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
mott |
Date/Time: |
Fri, November 3, 2000 at 9:31 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
people centric TLD for connecting people - great concept |
Message: |
|
DNS was mainly invented to
decouple the description of a service from the machine which implements it. For instance,
my main computer has the same name for the last 15 years. Obviously, I have changed
the physical model a few times :) The same is half-true for my email. I had the same
user name over all these years (the part before the @), but the reminder changed
various times due to changing jobs, providers, ... every time, it was a major hassle
to inform everyone of the change, not to mention the numerous bounced mails to old
friends and collegues who changed theirs without me knowing. The current naming
schemes assumes you are part of an organisation. This is good for the organisation/provider
as it may make us think twice before we change that provider. I always wanted that
freedom and for a long time I was considering getting my name as domain, but I never
saw myself as a max.com, nor a max.org. I do like max.i. While that freedom is
very appealing, the engineer in me can see many additional benefits and cool applications.
"phone.max.i", "resume.max.i", "public_key.max.i", .... As I said at the beginning
DNS decouples the name of a service from the device providing it. Nowadays, that
binding is very static and the current design of bind gets a lot of milage out of
caching. If we move into applications where that binding is more dynamic (That
blue phone works better with my red shirt) the infrastructure needs to be able to
handle that and the proposal should address that. In summary, as the focus of the
Internet shifts from large corporations and their worker bees to individual users,
so should the naming. Max Ott CTO, Semandex Networks, Inc.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .i Application by Sarnoff Corporation Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (30/38)
- .i TLD and Single Letters B. Ferns, November 5 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)
- A completely outsourced solution - with some interesting costs griffiths, November 5 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
- Time for a people-centric TLD skey, November 5 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)
- a badly needed idea!!! spareek, November 5 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- .i proposal manishie, November 5 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Delighted by the .i submission from Sarnoff rp@1sta.net, November 5 @ 9:57 AM (0/0)
- Support for this application and some suggestions steve smith, November 4 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
- A powerful structure for ubiquitous personal communications. d_reininger, November 4 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
- people centric TLD for connecting people - great concept mott, November 3 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- MESSAGE simonb, November 3 @ 6:42 PM (1/1)
- Support for .i tld Wendy Suen, November 3 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
- Great Concept! phillipgb, November 3 @ 5:51 PM (1/1)
- Agreement that .i makes strategic sense for the Internet JNathenson, November 3 @ 1:19 PM (1/1)
- .i proposal from sarnoff jcienski, November 3 @ 1:08 PM (0/0)
- .i Proposal from Sarnoff Corporation. jtodd, November 1 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- .i is good for the internet Donovan, November 1 @ 12:18 AM (1/1)
- Help solve the glut of domain names pdesilva, November 1 @ 2:53 AM (0/0)
- New People centric TLD .i ThomasGeorge, October 31 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
- .geo plus .i = ? adoyle, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (1/1)
- TLD for individuals, an excellent idea. AmitKapoor, October 30 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
- .i could be my buddy. vpincus, October 30 @ 2:40 PM (0/0)
- .i for the masses. JosephMathew, October 26 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- Single character gTLDs are a bad idea mikel5, October 26 @ 1:52 PM (1/3)
- Sounds great, but what about user and community control ? Dom, October 26 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
- .i proposal peniel, October 26 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
- What values are envisioned to be associated with .i names? McQuilWP, October 25 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)
- .i proposal works for the developing world shyam, October 24 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)
- Bad idea sjk, October 19 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- Great application and concept huguesdb, October 16 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy