Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Proposal Team |
Date/Time: |
Sun, November 5, 2000 at 11:31 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Sarnoff and SRI operate as independent entities |
Message: |
|
Though Sarnoff is a wholly owned
subsidiary of SRI, they operate as two individual & independent entities and have
business relationships at arms length. Sarnoff and SRI have two different
Board of Directors and SRI does not have majority Board seats in Sarnoff’s Board. Corporate
structure is different: Sarnoff is a for-profit organization and SRI is for non-profit. Treasury
functions are separate Taxes are filed separately Each owns its respective
intellectual properties They often compete for businesses in normal business operations. Clarification
provided by Sarnoff and NextDNS
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .i Application by Sarnoff Corporation Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (30/38)
- .i TLD and Single Letters B. Ferns, November 5 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)
- A completely outsourced solution - with some interesting costs griffiths, November 5 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
- Time for a people-centric TLD skey, November 5 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)
- a badly needed idea!!! spareek, November 5 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- .i proposal manishie, November 5 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Delighted by the .i submission from Sarnoff rp@1sta.net, November 5 @ 9:57 AM (0/0)
- Support for this application and some suggestions steve smith, November 4 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
- A powerful structure for ubiquitous personal communications. d_reininger, November 4 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
- people centric TLD for connecting people - great concept mott, November 3 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- MESSAGE simonb, November 3 @ 6:42 PM (1/1)
- Support for .i tld Wendy Suen, November 3 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
- Great Concept! phillipgb, November 3 @ 5:51 PM (1/1)
- Agreement that .i makes strategic sense for the Internet JNathenson, November 3 @ 1:19 PM (1/1)
- .i proposal from sarnoff jcienski, November 3 @ 1:08 PM (0/0)
- .i Proposal from Sarnoff Corporation. jtodd, November 1 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- .i is good for the internet Donovan, November 1 @ 12:18 AM (1/1)
- Help solve the glut of domain names pdesilva, November 1 @ 2:53 AM (0/0)
- New People centric TLD .i ThomasGeorge, October 31 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
- .geo plus .i = ? adoyle, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (1/1)
- Sarnoff and SRI operate as independent entities Proposal Team, November 5 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
- TLD for individuals, an excellent idea. AmitKapoor, October 30 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
- .i could be my buddy. vpincus, October 30 @ 2:40 PM (0/0)
- .i for the masses. JosephMathew, October 26 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
- Single character gTLDs are a bad idea mikel5, October 26 @ 1:52 PM (1/3)
- Sounds great, but what about user and community control ? Dom, October 26 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
- .i proposal peniel, October 26 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
- What values are envisioned to be associated with .i names? McQuilWP, October 25 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)
- .i proposal works for the developing world shyam, October 24 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)
- Bad idea sjk, October 19 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- Great application and concept huguesdb, October 16 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy