Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	NetNumber
Date/Time:	Wed, November 1, 2000 at 5:45 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	Additional ENUM Thoughts
Message:
The comment about the power of the IETF-ENUM standard is right on target.  I'd like to further clarify that the Pulver/Peek/Marschel ".tel" application is the only TLD application dealing with telephone numbers that is ENUM compliant.  The other telephone number based TLD's (other ".tel" applications, ".one", etc.) don't even mention the IETF-ENUM standard in their applications because they are trying to solve a different problem.  (See the "Competition at Risk" posting for more detail on ".tel" versus "e164.arpa") The mapping of telephone numbers to Internet addresses is a core requirement for the emerging Internet-Telephony industry.   The Pulver/Peek/Marschel ".tel" application is the only TLD application that is positioned to create effective competition for the "e164.arpa" implementation of the ENUM standard. All of the ".tel" applications are not created equal.  Don't miss this opportunity to create competition within the DNS and to advance the growth of the emerging Internet-Telephony industry on a global basis.   Douglas Ranalli Founder & Chief Strategy Officer NetNumber.com

Message Thread:

• .tel Application by Pulver, Peek, and Marschel — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:06 PM (15/24)
• Let's go forward — MSisson, November 6 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
• Pulver does not need .tel — hta, November 4 @ 11:01 PM (1/1)
• Competition needs ".tel" — NetNumber, November 5 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
• Support for Netnumber application — travelocity, November 4 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
• ITU, IETF, ICANN, ENUM, "e164.arpa" and ".tel" — NetNumber, November 4 @ 3:44 PM (1/1)
• A view from the IETF ENUM WG — ITAB, November 4 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
• Lucent Representative Nominated To ITAB Board — ITAB, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
• After reading all three proposals — R.Jackson, November 1 @ 10:56 PM (1/1)
• Implementation Experience Counts — davidbk, November 3 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
• .tel application — bboston, October 31 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
• Power Of The ENUM Standard — perignon, October 31 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)
• Additional ENUM Thoughts — NetNumber, November 1 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
• Support for ".tel" TLD — dischang, October 26 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
• 3Com Internet-Telephony Executive nominated to ITAB Board — ITAB, October 26 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
• Competition At Risk — NetNumber, October 25 @ 5:38 PM (2/4)
• Support for ".tel" TLD — garciar8, October 30 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)
• Printer friendly PDF version of "Competition At Risk" paper — NetNumber, October 25 @ 7:00 PM (2/2)
• Comment from South Korea — JW Park, October 27 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
• PTT Control Is A Real Issue — Juergen, October 27 @ 8:56 AM (0/0)
• Please take the opportunity to act -- not just talk — gkrucik, October 25 @ 3:02 AM (0/0)
• The competition is here if you look — marshm, October 24 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
• ENUM + ICANN-granted E.164 policy control + trademark rights — Judith Oppenheimer, October 20 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)
• such a boring conventional standardisation — jefsey, November 4 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:39 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy