Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
hta |
Date/Time: |
Sat, November 4, 2000 at 11:01 PM GMT (Sun, November 5, 2000 at 12:01 AM CET) |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.5 using Windows NT |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Pulver does not need .tel |
Message: |
|
There is no reason to allocate .tel to Pulver for the
application it wants to field. It already owns and operates .e164.com for that
purpose.The question of competition between .e164.arpa and the pulver approach
will be settled whether or not Pulver gets .tel. I believe using up one of the
5-10 slots on the initial gTLD rollout on Pulver's .tel is wasteful. (OTOH, I
think the other 2 .tel proposals are worse)
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .tel Application by Pulver, Peek, and Marschel Moderator, October 7 @ 10:06 PM (15/24)
- Let's go forward MSisson, November 6 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
- Pulver does not need .tel hta, November 4 @ 11:01 PM (1/1)
- Support for Netnumber application travelocity, November 4 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
- ITU, IETF, ICANN, ENUM, "e164.arpa" and ".tel" NetNumber, November 4 @ 3:44 PM (1/1)
- Lucent Representative Nominated To ITAB Board ITAB, November 3 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
- After reading all three proposals R.Jackson, November 1 @ 10:56 PM (1/1)
- .tel application bboston, October 31 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
- Power Of The ENUM Standard perignon, October 31 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)
- Support for ".tel" TLD dischang, October 26 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
- 3Com Internet-Telephony Executive nominated to ITAB Board ITAB, October 26 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
- Competition At Risk NetNumber, October 25 @ 5:38 PM (2/4)
- Please take the opportunity to act -- not just talk gkrucik, October 25 @ 3:02 AM (0/0)
- The competition is here if you look marshm, October 24 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
- ENUM + ICANN-granted E.164 policy control + trademark rights Judith Oppenheimer, October 20 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:39 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy