Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
marshm |
Date/Time: |
Tue, October 17, 2000 at 4:11 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Not all applications are in conflict |
Message: |
|
When you state the following: "The only tld that does not conflict is IOD's .web
application. IOD makes the best choice in my opinion." ...you are incorrect.
Our proposal (Diebold Incorporated) is proposing .cash, .global and .secure - none
of which are in conflict anywhere, even in the ORSC Root Zone. Gene Marsh Diebold
Incorporated
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/43)
- Further Statement in Support of our Application PhilBerent, November 5 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Affinity application jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
- Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)
- Affinity App peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)
- Reply dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- jandl is right. bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Support for Affinity Proposal SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- .biz and .ebiz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/10)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)
- Not all applications are in conflict marshm, October 17 @ 4:11 AM (1/1)
- Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)
- application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
- Our Application PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy