Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
PhilBerent |
Date/Time: |
Thu, October 26, 2000 at 9:33 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Identity and Affiliation Please? |
Message: |
|
Please say why you don't like the name lottery. After
all it is not a lottery to register the name. It is just a lottery to have your application
looked at before others - with a fully refundable fee if you don't win. When the
application is looked at it is assessed on the usual criteria i.e. are you an eligible
business in terms defined. It seemed to us a very fair way to avoid the "fingers
on the button" mentality which will take place in the initial rush if there is no
such procedure. As far as the $2,000 fee is concerned
we see this as a strong way of preventing frivolous applications ($2,000 is initial
fee and annual renewals are only $150). However, I fully agree with you on the point
about emerging market economies. For this reason, as stated in our TLD policies,
we intend to establish different hurdle levels for what is an "eligible business"
in each country and possibly different fee structures as well. Codes for emerging
market economies will be under sub-domains using the 2 letter country codes as in
ag.biz etc. Establishing the fee structure and the hurdles for each country is something
we intend to work on during the first year of operations. I would add that our
objective is to create domain name availability for people who actually want to do
business on the net by restricting registration. If we allowed open registration
under .biz, as is proposed in the other applications, once again names would be snapped
up by cyberhoarders and speculators and no one (small business/ third world country
business/ or otherwise) would have access to the name that they needed. Those
who do not wish to pay the fee will still have access to the .com universe. If we
allowed unrestricted low price registration within a few months the choices of names
under the .biz TLD might easily be hardly any better than those under .com Finally,
why do you not identify yourself? Are you affiliated with one of the competing teams?
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/43)
- Further Statement in Support of our Application PhilBerent, November 5 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Affinity application jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
- Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)
- Identity and Affiliation Please? PhilBerent, October 26 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
- Affinity App peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)
- Reply dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- jandl is right. bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Support for Affinity Proposal SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- .biz and .ebiz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/10)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)
- Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)
- application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
- Our Application PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy