Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
jandl |
Date/Time: |
Sun, October 29, 2000 at 9:33 PM GMT (Sun, October 29, 2000 at 5:33 PM EDT) |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
It's not even unofficial |
Message: |
|
Root server systems are just
that - systems. None that I am aware of claim to be knock offs, which the term
"unofficial" would indicate. It is a benefit to the public for a root server
system to include as a subset, the ICANN TLD's, but none have to do that. It
is a courtesy to ICANN that the information is included. The
problem as I see it is that most people do not understand that anyone can set up
a root server system, and many more will do so. The beauty of it is that the
more systems who cooperate with one another, the more widely the load is balanced,
and the less likely there would be a world-wide failure if one entire system went
down. There is nothing, however, which says that any root
server system is the de facto "official" system. As time passes, there may
be other systems which are as widely used as the legacy root system we are most familiar
with. Hopefully, they will all carry the same information (plus any private
TLDs they may choose) and people can make choices as to which servers they wish to
point for service. Not that I really like the comparison because
of regulation, but just as you can choose cable as opposed to dish or one cable company
over another, you will be able to choose root server systems as they become available.
There may be a slightly different choice of TLD's in each, and the public will determine
which are the most popular and, thus, the most viable. It would therefore,
behoove the root system operators to carry the most number of available TLDs, would
it not? That includes ICANN, IMO.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/43)
- Further Statement in Support of our Application PhilBerent, November 5 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Affinity application jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
- Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)
- Affinity App peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)
- Reply dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- jandl is right. bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Support for Affinity Proposal SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- .biz and .ebiz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/10)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)
- Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)
- application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
- Our Application PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy