Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
A. Kinney |
Date/Time: |
Fri, October 20, 2000 at 4:28 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V4.5 using Macintosh |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
.biz and .ebiz would result in confusion |
Message: |
|
The issue is not, as Mr.
Berent suggests, whether Belize has the “right” to market .bz to be the “sole
TLD exclusively for business.” Clearly no "right" has been conferred upon
the “.bz” TLD and Mr. Berent even states several potential business TLDs that
would not result in confusion (e.g. “.ecom,” “.inc,” and “.firm”). Rather
the issue is whether confusion would be created between an existing TLD (.bz)
that is being marketed as a business TLD and pronounced as “dot BIZ” and a TLD
that has not yet been issued (.biz or .ebiz) for use as a business TLD and also
pronounced as “dot BIZ" or "dot E-BIZ.” It is obvious that confusion would
indeed result from granting a “.biz” or ".ebiz" TLD.While Mr. Berent takes
issue that Belize did not submit an application, it should be noted that .bz
is already a valid existing ccTLD and no application is necessary to request
its issuance for Mr. Berent or ICANN to review. Furthermore, Belize may
use its existing .bz TLD however it desires and has decided to license it to
a third party to offer domain names to businesses. ICANN is now aware that
.bz is being marketed to businesses. Factors which ICANN has indicated
it will consider in whether to grant a presently non-issued TLD is whether it
would disrupt the Internet due to confusion with an existing TLD and whether
a subsequently issued TLD would negatively impact an existing TLD. The
.bz TLD is currently existing and owned by the country of Belize. A .biz
or .ebiz TLD has not been issued or being marketed at this time. If either
a .biz or .ebiz TLD were to be issued, unnecessary confusion would result and
an existing ccTLD would be negatively impacted. Mr. Berent’s position at Affinity
Internet and Affinity Internet’s desire to obtain a .biz or .ebiz TLD from ICANN
makes it obvious why he would advocate issuance of the TLDs in the face of causing
certain confusion in the Internet. However, while he may complain that .bz
should not have the right to be marketed for businesses or that he was not
given enough information to evaluate its marketing and operational plan himself,
the reality is that .bz is an existing TLD, .bz is being marketed to businesses,
and the issuance of .biz or .ebiz would result in the exact confusion with an
existing TLD that ICANN has clearly expressed should be avoided in its criteria
for assessing applications. Therefore, applications for .biz and .ebiz should
be rejected to prevent unnecessary confusion.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/43)
- Further Statement in Support of our Application PhilBerent, November 5 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Affinity application jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
- Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)
- Affinity App peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)
- Reply dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
- jandl is right. bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
- Support for Affinity Proposal SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- .biz and .ebiz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/10)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- .biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)
- Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)
- application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
- Our Application PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy